Radiological Assessment of Lower Limb Torsional Deformities: a Narrative Review

Overview

Journal Ann Jt

Publisher AME Publishing Company

Date 2025 Feb 21

PMID 39981433

Authors

Pietro Conte

Giuseppe Anzillotti

Nicola Pizza

Caterina Chiappe

Rodolfo Morales-Avalos

Vicente Sanchis-Alfonso

Joan Carles Monllau

Simone Perelli

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background And Objective: The evaluation of both femoral and tibial torsional profiles remains a challenge in the orthopedic practice since there is no agreement on the most precise and reliable measurement method and technique. The aim of this review is to collect and critically report the most relevant and up-to-date evidence on the radiological techniques available to determine lower limb torsional deformities and to discuss the advantages and limitations of each technique to better define their optimal field of application.

Methods: Literature research on PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases was performed, utilizing the following search string: "torsion" AND ("lower limb" OR "femur" OR "tibia"). Relevant clinical and preclinical studies evaluating different radiological techniques to assess lower limb torsional deformities, and possibly comparing them, were collected and critically reviewed.

Key Content And Findings: Computed tomography (CT) is still considered the best method to measure both femoral and tibial torsional angles. Its main limitation, the radiation exposure, has been recently addressed with ultra-low dose protocols that were proven to be as accurate as standard protocols. On the other hand, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers a nonionizing, radiation-free option that is now considered almost equivalent to CT. However, MRI consists in a long and expensive procedure that can be hindered by issues linked to metal implants, patient's positioning and measurement variabilities. Lastly, three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions derived from low-dose biplanar radiographies (LD-BRs) have been proposed as a low-radiating, quick and reliable solution to overcome the limitations of both MRI and CT scans.

Conclusions: To date, CT has still to be considered the gold standard for the radiological assessment of lower limb torsional deformities. Nonetheless, MRI and LD-BR have been proven to be valid and reliable alternatives, especially in specific clinical settings.

References

Vanhove F, Noppe N, Fragomen A, Hoekstra H, Vanderschueren G, Metsemakers W . Standardization of torsional CT measurements of the lower limbs with threshold values for corrective osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019; 139(6):795-805. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-019-03139-1. View

Barton K, Boldt K, Sogbein O, Steiner N, Moatshe G, Arendt E . Femoral internal torsion greater than twenty-five degrees and/or external tibial torsion greater than thirty degrees as measured by computed tomography are threshold values for axial alignment correction in patellofemoral instability. J ISAKOS. 2024; 9(3):386-393. DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2024.02.002. View

Panou A, Stanitski D, Stanitski C, Peccati A, Portinaro N . Intra-observer and inter-observer errors in CT measurement of torsional profiles of lower limbs: a retrospective comparative study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015; 10:67. PMC: 4440600. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-015-0200-1. View

Meyrignac O, Moreno R, Baunin C, Vial J, Accadbled F, Sommet A . Low-dose biplanar radiography can be used in children and adolescents to accurately assess femoral and tibial torsion and greatly reduce irradiation. Eur Radiol. 2014; 25(6):1752-60. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3560-8. View

Brooks J, Bomar J, Jeffords M, Farnsworth C, Pennock A, Upasani V . Reliability of Low-dose Biplanar Radiography in Assessing Pediatric Torsional Pathology. J Pediatr Orthop. 2020; 41(1):33-39. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001700. View

Rosskopf A, Ramseier L, Sutter R, Pfirrmann C, Buck F . Femoral and tibial torsion measurement in children and adolescents: comparison of 3D models based on low-dose biplanar radiography and low-dose CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 202(3):W285-91. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.11103. View

Waelti S, Fischer T, Griessinger J, Cip J, Dietrich T, Ditchfield M . Ultra-low-dose computed tomography for torsion measurements of the lower extremities in children and adolescents. Insights Imaging. 2022; 13(1):118. PMC: 9287501. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-022-01257-w. View

Becher C, Fleischer B, Rase M, Schumacher T, Ettinger M, Ostermeier S . Effects of upright weight bearing and the knee flexion angle on patellofemoral indices using magnetic resonance imaging in patients with patellofemoral instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015; 25(8):2405-2413. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3829-8. View

Sanchis-Alfonso V, Ramirez-Fuentes C, Beser-Robles M, Rosello-Anon A, Chiappe C, Marti-Bonmati L . Increased femoral anteversion in females with anterior knee pain relates to both the neck and the shaft of the femur. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023; 144(1):51-57. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-05036-0. View

10.

Ferner F, Dickschas J, Jasinski M, Huettner F, Harrer J, Lutter C . Correction of tibial tubercle trochlea groove distance is related to torsional correction in high tibial derotational osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022; 31(3):1176-1182. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07190-1. View

11.

Scorcelletti M, Reeves N, Rittweger J, Ireland A . Femoral anteversion: significance and measurement. J Anat. 2020; 237(5):811-826. PMC: 7542196. DOI: 10.1111/joa.13249. View

12.

Keller G, Afat S, Ahrend M, Springer F . Diagnostic accuracy of ultra-low-dose CT for torsion measurement of the lower limb. Eur Radiol. 2020; 31(6):3574-3581. PMC: 8249276. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07528-8. View

13.

Schock J, Truhn D, Nurnberger D, Conrad S, Huppertz M, Keil S . Artificial intelligence-based automatic assessment of lower limb torsion on MRI. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):23244. PMC: 8636587. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02708-y. View

14.

Morvan G, Guerini H, Carre G, Vuillemin V . Femoral Torsion: Impact of Femur Position on CT and Stereoradiography Measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017; 209(2):W93-W99. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.16.16638. View

15.

Berrington de Gonzalez A, Mahesh M, Kim K, Bhargavan M, Lewis R, Mettler F . Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169(22):2071-7. PMC: 6276814. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.440. View

16.

Jin S, Xu C, Cai H, Chen C, Lu Y, Wang Z . Comparative Analysis of Physical Examination, CT Scan, and Three-Dimensional Gait Analysis in Evaluating Lower Extremity Torsion Deformities in Children with Cerebral Palsy. Med Sci Monit. 2023; 29:e940948. PMC: 10512746. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.940948. View

17.

Benazzo F, Rossi S, Danesino G, Klersy C, Perelli S, Ghiara M . Computed tomography evaluation of total knee arthroplasty implants position after two different surgical methods of implantation. Int Orthop. 2018; 43(1):139-149. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-4180-8. View

18.

Keller G, Gotz S, Kraus M, Grunwald L, Springer F, Afat S . Radiation Dose Reduction in CT Torsion Measurement of the Lower Limb: Introduction of a New Ultra-Low Dose Protocol. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(7). PMC: 8304839. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11071209. View

19.

Stephen J, Teitge R, Williams A, Calder J, El Daou H . A Validated, Automated, 3-Dimensional Method to Reliably Measure Tibial Torsion. Am J Sports Med. 2021; 49(3):747-756. PMC: 7917570. DOI: 10.1177/0363546520986873. View

20.

Botser I, Ozoude G, Martin D, Siddiqi A, Kuppuswami S, Domb B . Femoral anteversion in the hip: comparison of measurement by computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and physical examination. Arthroscopy. 2012; 28(5):619-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.10.021. View