» Articles » PMID: 39981269

Structural Stigma, Gender-affirming Interventions, and Identity Concealment As Determinants of Depression and Life Satisfaction Among Trans Adults in 28 European Countries

Overview
Date 2025 Feb 21
PMID 39981269
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although medical gender-affirming interventions (GAIs) are vital for most transgender individuals, previous evidence regarding their impacts on psychological well-being is mixed. While some studies reported improvements, others failed to find such effects. Using a large-scale dataset of trans adults from 28 European countries, we aimed to understand how structural stigma and identity concealment might explain this inconsistency.

Method: 15,845 trans adults who participated in the EU-LGBTI-II survey, including measures of gender-affirming interventions, identity concealment, and life satisfaction and depression, were included in the analyses. Structural stigma was measured as the discriminatory laws, social policies, and public attitudes. The data was analyzed with multilevel moderated mediation analyses.

Results: Results demonstrated that structural stigma was associated with lower levels of undergoing GAIs. Also, GAIs were indirectly associated with higher levels of life satisfaction and lower levels of depression through increased identity concealment. Structural stigma moderated this association such that these indirect effects were amplified for trans adults living in countries with lower structural stigma.

Conclusions: Results suggest that identity concealment might protect the mental health of trans adults undergoing GAIs, especially in low-stigma contexts, increased identity concealment. Thus, policies and interventions targeting discriminatory legislation and negative societal attitudes should be implemented to promote access to GAIs and to improve the well-being of transgender individuals, and trans individuals should be supported in their identity management processes.

References
1.
Bauer G, Braimoh J, Scheim A, Dharma C . Transgender-inclusive measures of sex/gender for population surveys: Mixed-methods evaluation and recommendations. PLoS One. 2017; 12(5):e0178043. PMC: 5444783. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178043. View

2.
Chaudoir S, Fisher J . The disclosure processes model: understanding disclosure decision making and postdisclosure outcomes among people living with a concealable stigmatized identity. Psychol Bull. 2010; 136(2):236-56. PMC: 2922991. DOI: 10.1037/a0018193. View

3.
Meyer I . Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychol Bull. 2003; 129(5):674-697. PMC: 2072932. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674. View

4.
Pachankis J, Jackson S . A Developmental Model of the Sexual Minority Closet: Structural Sensitization, Psychological Adaptations, and Post-closet Growth. Arch Sex Behav. 2022; 52(5):1869-1895. PMC: 9935753. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-022-02381-w. View

5.
Doyle D, Lewis T, Barreto M . A systematic review of psychosocial functioning changes after gender-affirming hormone therapy among transgender people. Nat Hum Behav. 2023; 7(8):1320-1331. PMC: 10444622. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-023-01605-w. View