Amplified Intraindividual Variability in Motor Performance in Stroke Survivors: Links to Cognitive and Clinical Outcomes

Overview

Journal Brain Behav

Specialty Psychology

Date 2025 Feb 20

PMID 39972991

Authors

Stefan Delmas

Anjali Tiwari

Han-Yun Tseng

Sharon N Poisson

Manfred Diehl

Neha Lodha

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Intraindividual variability (IIV) in motor performance reflects unintentional fluctuations in the motor output across repeated attempts. Behavioral variability in older adults has been linked to impaired neuronal integrity and cognitive decline. Despite this, the traditional motor assessments in stroke have neglected to characterize IIV in motor performance also known as "motor inconsistency." Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the impact of stroke on motor inconsistency and its relationship with cognitive and clinical outcomes.

Methods: Sixty-six stroke survivors and 32 healthy older adults performed 30 trials of a goal-directed task to match a force-time target of 10 N in 180 ms. To measure motor inconsistency, we applied a well-established approach to measuring IIV from the cognitive aging literature that accounts for the inherent, systematic effects of practice and mean-level performance on IIV. In addition, participants completed domain-specific cognitive evaluations and global clinical assessments. Domain-specific cognitive evaluations assessed episodic memory, visuospatial processing, processing speed, and executive function. Global clinical assessments included years of education as a proxy of cognitive reserve, the Dementia Rating Scale-2 (DRS-2), ankle strength, and the Modified Rankin Score (mRS).

Results: Stroke survivors exhibited greater motor inconsistency compared with healthy older adults. Declines in domain-specific cognitive function, particularly executive dysfunction, predicted motor inconsistency in stroke survivors. Cognitive reserve and mRS emerged as significant predictors of motor inconsistency.

Conclusions: Stroke significantly impairs the ability to perform a motor task with consistency. Compromised executive function following stroke is associated with increased motor inconsistency. Interestingly, reduced cognitive reserve and greater functional disability are linked to increased motor inconsistency in stroke survivors. These findings highlight that inconsistency is an important indicator of motor dysfunction following stroke that is linked to cognitive and clinical outcomes and may serve as an important target for stroke rehabilitation.

References

Chang S, Francisco G, Zhou P, Rymer W, Li S . Spasticity, weakness, force variability, and sustained spontaneous motor unit discharges of resting spastic-paretic biceps brachii muscles in chronic stroke. Muscle Nerve. 2013; 48(1):85-92. PMC: 3691331. DOI: 10.1002/mus.23699. View

Hammerbeck U, Yousif N, Hoad D, Greenwood R, Diedrichsen J, Rothwell J . Chronic Stroke Survivors Improve Reaching Accuracy by Reducing Movement Variability at the Trained Movement Speed. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017; 31(6):499-508. DOI: 10.1177/1545968317693112. View

Rosenich E, Hordacre B, Paquet C, Koblar S, Hillier S . Cognitive Reserve as an Emerging Concept in Stroke Recovery. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2020; 34(3):187-199. DOI: 10.1177/1545968320907071. View

Yacoubi B, Christou E . Motor Output Variability in Movement Disorders: Insights From Essential Tremor. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2024; 52(3):95-101. DOI: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000338. View

Danieli K, Guyon A, Bethus I . Episodic Memory formation: A review of complex Hippocampus input pathways. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2023; 126:110757. DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2023.110757. View

Burton C, Hultsch D, Strauss E, Hunter M . Intraindividual variability in physical and emotional functioning: comparison of adults with traumatic brain injuries and healthy adults. Clin Neuropsychol. 2003; 16(3):264-79. DOI: 10.1076/clin.16.3.264.13854. View

van Beers R . Motor learning is optimally tuned to the properties of motor noise. Neuron. 2009; 63(3):406-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.025. View

Gordon J, Ghilardi M, Ghez C . Accuracy of planar reaching movements. I. Independence of direction and extent variability. Exp Brain Res. 1994; 99(1):97-111. DOI: 10.1007/BF00241415. View

Jackson J, Balota D, Duchek J, Head D . White matter integrity and reaction time intraindividual variability in healthy aging and early-stage Alzheimer disease. Neuropsychologia. 2011; 50(3):357-66. PMC: 3302689. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.11.024. View

10.

Faria-Fortini I, Basilio M, Polese J, Menezes K, Faria C, Scianni A . Strength deficits of the paretic lower extremity muscles were the impairment variables that best explained restrictions in participation after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2016; 39(21):2158-2163. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1219397. View

11.

Best J, Miller P . A developmental perspective on executive function. Child Dev. 2010; 81(6):1641-60. PMC: 3058827. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01499.x. View

12.

Hu X, Newell K . Motor-unit pool model of continuous and discrete force variability. Motor Control. 2011; 15(4):439-55. DOI: 10.1123/mcj.15.4.439. View

13.

Desmurget , Grafton . Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000; 4(11):423-431. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01537-0. View

14.

van Vugt F, Ostry D . The Structure and Acquisition of Sensorimotor Maps. J Cogn Neurosci. 2017; 30(3):290-306. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01204. View

15.

Teasell R, Foley N, Bhogal S, Speechley M . An evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2003; 10(1):29-58. DOI: 10.1310/8YNA-1YHK-YMHB-XTE1. View

16.

Boissy P, Bourbonnais D, Carlotti M, Gravel D, Arsenault B . Maximal grip force in chronic stroke subjects and its relationship to global upper extremity function. Clin Rehabil. 1999; 13(4):354-62. DOI: 10.1191/026921599676433080. View

17.

Chow J, Stokic D . Force control of quadriceps muscle is bilaterally impaired in subacute stroke. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011; 111(5):1290-5. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00462.2011. View

18.

Haynes B, Bauermeister S, Bunce D . A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Associations Between Reaction Time Intraindividual Variability and Age-Related Cognitive Decline or Impairment, Dementia, and Mortality. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017; 23(5):431-445. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617717000236. View

19.

Lodha N, Patel P, Casamento-Moran A, Hays E, Poisson S, Christou E . Strength or Motor Control: What Matters in High-Functioning Stroke?. Front Neurol. 2019; 9:1160. PMC: 6333669. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01160. View

20.

Ada L, ODwyer N, ONeill E . Relation between spasticity, weakness and contracture of the elbow flexors and upper limb activity after stroke: an observational study. Disabil Rehabil. 2006; 28(13-14):891-7. DOI: 10.1080/09638280500535165. View