» Articles » PMID: 39972458

Limitations of SpO / FiO-ratio for Classification and Monitoring of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome-an Observational Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Crit Care
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2025 Feb 19
PMID 39972458
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The ratio of pulse-oximetric peripheral oxygen saturation to fraction of inspired oxygen (SpO/FiO) has been proposed as additional hypoxemia criterion in a new global definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This study aims to evaluate the clinical and theoretical limitations of the SpO/FiO-ratio when using it to classify patients with ARDS and to follow disease progression.

Methods: Observational cohort study of ARDS patients from three high-resolution Intensive Care Unit databases, including our own database ICU Cockpit, MIMIC-IV (Version 3.0) and SICdb (Version 1.0.6). Patients with ARDS were identified based on the Berlin criteria or ICD 9/10-codes. Time-matched datapoints of SpO, FiO and partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO) were created. Severity classification followed the thresholds for SpO/FiO and PaO/FiO of the newly proposed global definition.

Results: Overall, 708 ARDS patients were included in the analysis. ARDS severity was misclassified by SpO/FiO in 33% of datapoints, out of which 84% were classified as more severe. This can be partially explained by imprecision of SpO measurement and equation used to transform SpO/FiO to PaO/FiO A high dependence of SpO/FiO-ratio on FiO settings was found, leading to major treatment effect and limited capability for tracking change in ARDS severity, which was achieved in less than 20% of events.

Conclusions: The use of SpO/FiO interchangeably with PaO/FiO for severity classification and monitoring of ARDS is limited by its inadequate trending ability and high dependence on FiO settings, which may influence treatment decisions and patient selection in clinical trials.

References
1.
Schjorring O, Klitgaard T, Perner A, Wetterslev J, Lange T, Siegemund M . Lower or Higher Oxygenation Targets for Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure. N Engl J Med. 2021; 384(14):1301-1311. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2032510. View

2.
Schmidt M, Gernand J, Kakarala R . The use of the pulse oximetric saturation to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio in an automated acute respiratory distress syndrome screening tool. J Crit Care. 2015; 30(3):486-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.02.007. View

3.
Cane R, Shapiro B, Templin R, Walther K . Unreliability of oxygen tension-based indices in reflecting intrapulmonary shunting in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 1988; 16(12):1243-5. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-198812000-00014. View

4.
Girardis M, Busani S, Damiani E, Donati A, Rinaldi L, Marudi A . Effect of Conservative vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Mortality Among Patients in an Intensive Care Unit: The Oxygen-ICU Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016; 316(15):1583-1589. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.11993. View

5.
von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M, Pocock S, Gotzsche P, Vandenbroucke J . The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007; 370(9596):1453-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X. View