» Articles » PMID: 39972386

Impact of the Hierarchical Medical System on the Perceived Quality of Primary Care in China: a Quasi-experimental Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2025 Feb 19
PMID 39972386
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although the implementation of a hierarchical medical system (HMS) has been shown to improve the allocation of medical resources and patient health-seeking behaviour, its role in patient's perceived quality of primary care remains unexplored. This study aimed to assess the impact of HMS implementation on rural and urban residents' perceived quality of primary care.

Methods: Data were obtained from the China Family Panel Study for 2012, 2014, 2016, and 2018. A total of 40,011 rural and 22,482 urban residents were included in the research participants for analysis. This study adopted a quasi-natural experimental design, and the multiple-period difference-in-differences method was used to capture changes in patient's perceived quality of primary care before and after the introduction of HMS.

Results: We found that HMS implementation declined the perceived quality of primary care by an average of 18% among rural residents (OR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99), while there was no significant change among urban residents (OR: 1.13, 95% CI 0.87-1.46). There was a 24% reduction in the perceived quality of primary care (OR: 0.76, 95% CI 0.61-0.96) one year after HMS among rural residents, and there was no statistically significant difference two years after HMS. After HMS implementation, the level of perceived quality of primary care by rural patients with chronic diseases decreased by 72% (OR: 0.28, 95% CI 0.11-0.78).

Conclusions: HMS has a limited effect on improving residents' perceived quality of primary care, especially for those living in rural areas. Policymakers are suggested to establish a quality monitoring system that incorporates patient experience as an essential standard to systematically evaluate the impacts of the HMS, with more efforts being put into helping vulnerable groups such as residents under 60 years old and patients with chronic diseases.

References
1.
Hung D, Mujal G, Jin A, Liang S . Patient experiences after implementing lean primary care redesigns. Health Serv Res. 2020; 56(3):363-370. PMC: 8143684. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13605. View

2.
Wei X, Li H, Yang N, Wong S, Owolabi O, Xu J . Comparing quality of public primary care between Hong Kong and Shanghai using validated patient assessment tools. PLoS One. 2015; 10(3):e0121269. PMC: 4380428. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121269. View

3.
Dunlop C, Howe A, Li D, Allen L . The coronavirus outbreak: the central role of primary care in emergency preparedness and response. BJGP Open. 2020; 4(1). PMC: 7330191. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101041. View

4.
Tourigny A, Aubin M, Haggerty J, Bonin L, Morin D, Reinharz D . Patients' perceptions of the quality of care after primary care reform: Family medicine groups in Quebec. Can Fam Physician. 2010; 56(7):e273-82. PMC: 2922830. View

5.
Barber S, Borowitz M, Bekedam H, Ma J . The hospital of the future in China: China's reform of public hospitals and trends from industrialized countries. Health Policy Plan. 2013; 29(3):367-78. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czt023. View