» Articles » PMID: 39970149

Development of Lifestyle Assessment: A Delphi Survey of Multi-faceted Health Experts

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2025 Feb 19
PMID 39970149
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: In the field of health promotion, there's a growing focus on adopting an academic approach to assess and evaluate the intricate and ever-evolving nature of lifestyles. This approach is crucial for shaping and improving a healthy way of life. Systematic measurement of lifestyles is essential for enhancing overall health and well-being, encompassing physical, mental, and social dimensions. This study's goal is to create an assessment tool that measures the diversity and intensity of lifestyle behaviors linked to human health. Our efforts involved developing quantitative measurement items that encompass the holistic concepts of health and lifestyle and validating them.

Methods: Between March and April 2023, we gathered insights from 14 experts in lifestyle and health. Building on previous research, we conducted a Delphi survey twice. In the initial survey, we collected expert opinions through open and closed-ended questions about lifestyle evaluation items. After the first survey, we corrected several items that didn't meet the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) standard before proceeding. We presented the first survey's findings to an expert panel, leading to a consensus.

Results: The initial Delphi round produced 76 items, and the second round resulted in 72 items after adjusting those with CVR scores of 0.51 or less. The final Content Validity Ratio was 0.83, signifying a robust validation process, with a convergence of 0.50 and a consensus level of 0.75.

Conclusion: In summary, this study successfully developed a comprehensive lifestyle assessment tool using a modified Delphi technique. The 72 items are categorized into eight subcategories and four overarching themes. This tool provides a systematic approach to evaluate lifestyles, promoting health and well-being across physical, mental, and social dimensions. It also assists in identifying specific lifestyle elements that require more in-depth intervention strategies, all while preserving the academic integrity of the content.

References
1.
Park K, Park J . Development of an elderly lifestyle profile: A Delphi survey of multidisciplinary health-care experts. PLoS One. 2020; 15(6):e0233565. PMC: 7266339. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233565. View

2.
Seeman T, Chen X . Risk and protective factors for physical functioning in older adults with and without chronic conditions: MacArthur Studies of Successful Aging. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002; 57(3):S135-44. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/57.3.s135. View

3.
Sinska B, Jaworski M, Panczyk M, Traczyk I, Kucharska A . The Role of Resilience and Basic Hope in the Adherence to Dietary Recommendations in the Polish Population during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Nutrients. 2021; 13(6). PMC: 8234050. DOI: 10.3390/nu13062108. View

4.
Jones C, Jhangri G, Yamamoto S, Hogan D, Hanson H, Levasseur M . Social participation of older people in urban and rural areas: Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. BMC Geriatr. 2023; 23(1):439. PMC: 10354920. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04127-2. View

5.
Kelishadi R . Life-Cycle Approach for Prevention of Non Communicable Disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019; 1121:1-6. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-10616-4_1. View