» Articles » PMID: 39967994

A Semantic Strength and Neural Correlates in Developmental Dyslexia

Abstract

Introduction: Most studies of dyslexia focus on domains of impairment (e.g., reading and phonology, among others), but few examine possible strengths. In the present study, we investigated semantic fluency as a cognitive strength in English-speaking children with dyslexia aged 8-13.

Methods: Ninety-seven children with dyslexia completed tests of letter and semantic verbal fluency, standardized measures of reading and cognitive functions, and task-free resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). First, we adjusted performance on semantic fluency by letter fluency and created a residual score that was used to separate participants into high (residual >0) or average (residual <0) semantic performance groups. We then employed a psycholinguistic clustering and switching approach to the semantic fluency task and performed dynamic task-free rs-fMRI connectivity analysis to reveal group differences in brain dynamics.

Results: High and average semantic fluency groups were well-matched on demographics and letter fluency but differed on their psycholinguistic patterns on the semantic fluency task. The high semantic fluency group, compared to the average semantic fluency group, produced a higher number of words within each cluster, a higher max cluster size, and a higher number of switches. Differential dynamic rs-fMRI connectivity (shorter average dwell time and greater brain state switches) was observed between the high and average groups in a large-scale bilateral frontal-temporal-occipital network.

Discussion: These data demonstrate that a subgroup of children with dyslexia perform above average on semantic fluency tasks and their performance is strongly linked to distinct psycholinguistic patterns and differences in a task-free resting-state brain network, which includes regions previously implicated in semantic processing. This work highlights that inter-individual differences should be taken into account in dyslexia and reveals a cognitive area of strength for some children with dyslexia that could be leveraged for reading interventions.

References
1.
Battistella G, Borghesani V, Henry M, Shwe W, Lauricella M, Miller Z . Task-Free Functional Language Networks: Reproducibility and Clinical Application. J Neurosci. 2019; 40(6):1311-1320. PMC: 7002153. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1485-19.2019. View

2.
Kave G, Kigel S, Kochva R . Switching and clustering in verbal fluency tasks throughout childhood. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2007; 30(3):349-59. DOI: 10.1080/13803390701416197. View

3.
Williams J, Rickert V, Hogan J, Zolten A, Satz P, DElia L . Children's color trails. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1995; 10(3):211-23. View

4.
Amunts J, Camilleri J, Eickhoff S, Heim S, Weis S . Executive functions predict verbal fluency scores in healthy participants. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):11141. PMC: 7341845. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65525-9. View

5.
Hallquist M, Hwang K, Luna B . The nuisance of nuisance regression: spectral misspecification in a common approach to resting-state fMRI preprocessing reintroduces noise and obscures functional connectivity. Neuroimage. 2013; 82:208-25. PMC: 3759585. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.116. View