» Articles » PMID: 39966749

Age at Type 1 Diabetes Onset Does Not Influence Attained Brain Volume

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2025 Feb 18
PMID 39966749
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Type 1 diabetes is suspected to hamper brain growth, implying that people with earlier diabetes onset would, on average, achieve lower maximal brain volume. We set out to test this hypothesis.

Methods: Examining brain MRI scans of middle-aged people with type 1 diabetes, we related age at diabetes onset to intracranial volume in 180 participants, as well as to cerebral gray and white matter volumes in a subset of 113 (63%) participants, using fractional polynomial regression models. Of the participants, 118 (67%) had been diagnosed with diabetes before 18 years of age.

Results: Of our participants, 54% were women, the median age 40.0 (IQR 33.2-45.0) years and the range of age at diabetes onset was 1.2-39.0 years. We found no association between age at diabetes onset and intracranial volume (p = 0.85), cerebral white (p = 0.10), or gray matter volumes (p = 0.12). Further, correlations between age at diabetes onset and the measured brain volumes were poor in analyses stratified for sex (all correlation coefficients ρ ≤ 0.16).

Conclusions: We found no association between age at diabetes onset and attained intracranial volume or gray or white matter volumes, indicating that type 1 diabetes may not have a clinically significant influence on brain growth.

References
1.
Tarkkonen A, Claesson T, Eriksson M, Forsblom C, Thorn L, Summanen P . Atrophy of the optic chiasm is associated with microvascular diabetic complications in type 1 diabetes. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1134530. PMC: 10262729. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1134530. View

2.
Mazaika P, Weinzimer S, Mauras N, Buckingham B, White N, Tsalikian E . Variations in Brain Volume and Growth in Young Children With Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes. 2015; 65(2):476-85. PMC: 4747456. DOI: 10.2337/db15-1242. View

3.
Pietschnig J, Penke L, Wicherts J, Zeiler M, Voracek M . Meta-analysis of associations between human brain volume and intelligence differences: How strong are they and what do they mean?. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015; 57:411-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.09.017. View

4.
Jancke L, Merillat S, Liem F, Hanggi J . Brain size, sex, and the aging brain. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014; 36(1):150-69. PMC: 6869393. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22619. View

5.
Royston P, Altman D, Sauerbrei W . Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea. Stat Med. 2005; 25(1):127-41. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2331. View