Effects of Stimulus Polarity on the Local Evoked Potential in Auditory Brainstem Implant Users

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2025 Feb 18

PMID 39966629

Authors

Anne Schroder

Marko Takanen

Konrad Schwarz

Thomas Lenarz

Lutz Gartner

Andreas Buchner

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Auditory brainstem implants (ABI) can enable hearing sensation through electrical stimulation of the cochlear nucleus. The basic stimulation and signal coding strategies of the ABI are based on those of the cochlear implant. This may not always be optimal, and ABI-specific strategies may be preferred. In a cohort of ten ABI users, we examined the feasibility of measuring local evoked potentials (LEP) via fine-grained stimulation with a forward masking paradigm. We introduce a new baseline-dependent definition of LEP amplitude for analyzing the LEP amplitude growth function to obtain threshold stimulation levels and slope values. The processing of biphasic pulses by the cochlear nucleus and the influence of the leading phase polarity were examined. There were no statistically significant differences in LEP thresholds or slopes between cathodic and anodic leading pulses. LEP thresholds measured with cathodic leading pulses (r = 0.77, t = 6.81, p < 0.0001) and anodic leading pulses (r = 0.70, t = 45.14, p < 0.0001) correlated significantly with perceptual hearing thresholds. The correlation analysis was impacted by outlier values, especially in the case of LEP thresholds measured with anodic leading pulses. Cathodic leading pulses had significantly shorter LEP peak latencies (t = 2.63, p < 0.01). These results show that the cathodic leading pulses are superior for eliciting LEPs. We suggest that cathodic leading pulses should be the basis for ABI-specific coding strategies.

References

Dhanasingh A, Hochmair I . ABI-auditory brainstem implant. Acta Otolaryngol. 2021; 141(sup1):63-81. DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2021.1888486. View

Hughes M, Goehring J, Baudhuin J . Effects of Stimulus Polarity and Artifact Reduction Method on the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential. Ear Hear. 2017; 38(3):332-343. PMC: 5404966. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000392. View

Harris C, Millman K, van der Walt S, Gommers R, Virtanen P, Cournapeau D . Array programming with NumPy. Nature. 2020; 585(7825):357-362. PMC: 7759461. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2. View

Lai W, Dillier N . A simple two-component model of the electrically evoked compound action potential in the human cochlea. Audiol Neurootol. 2000; 5(6):333-45. DOI: 10.1159/000013899. View

Schwartz M, Wilkinson E . Auditory brainstem implant program development. Laryngoscope. 2016; 127(8):1909-1915. DOI: 10.1002/lary.26312. View

van den Honert C, Mortimer J . The response of the myelinated nerve fiber to short duration biphasic stimulating currents. Ann Biomed Eng. 1979; 7(2):117-25. DOI: 10.1007/BF02363130. View

Lenarz T, Moshrefi M, Matthies C, Frohne C, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Illg A . Auditory brainstem implant: part I. Auditory performance and its evolution over time. Otol Neurotol. 2001; 22(6):823-33. DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200111000-00019. View

Macherey O, Carlyon R, van Wieringen A, Deeks J, Wouters J . Higher sensitivity of human auditory nerve fibers to positive electrical currents. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2008; 9(2):241-51. PMC: 2413083. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-008-0112-4. View

Gartner L, Lenarz T, Buchner A . Fine-grain recordings of the electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude growth function in cochlear implant recipients. Biomed Eng Online. 2018; 17(1):140. PMC: 6195717. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-018-0588-z. View

10.

Vincent C . Auditory brainstem implants: how do they work?. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2012; 295(11):1981-6. DOI: 10.1002/ar.22588. View

11.

Undurraga J, van Wieringen A, Carlyon R, Macherey O, Wouters J . Polarity effects on neural responses of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve at different cochlear sites. Hear Res. 2010; 269(1-2):146-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.06.017. View

12.

McInturff S, Coen F, Hight A, Tarabichi O, Kanumuri V, Vachicouras N . Comparison of Responses to DCN vs. VCN Stimulation in a Mouse Model of the Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI). J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2022; 23(3):391-412. PMC: 9085982. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-022-00840-8. View

13.

Cnaan A, Laird N, Slasor P . Using the general linear mixed model to analyse unbalanced repeated measures and longitudinal data. Stat Med. 1997; 16(20):2349-80. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19971030)16:20<2349::aid-sim667>3.0.co;2-e. View

14.

Imsiecke M, Buchner A, Lenarz T, Nogueira W . Amplitude Growth Functions of Auditory Nerve Responses to Electric Pulse Stimulation With Varied Interphase Gaps in Cochlear Implant Users With Ipsilateral Residual Hearing. Trends Hear. 2021; 25:23312165211014137. PMC: 8243142. DOI: 10.1177/23312165211014137. View

15.

Zeng F . Celebrating the one millionth cochlear implant. JASA Express Lett. 2022; 2(7):077201. DOI: 10.1121/10.0012825. View

16.

Brummer S, Turner M . Electrochemical considerations for safe electrical stimulation of the nervous system with platinum electrodes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1977; 24(1):59-63. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.1977.326218. View

17.

Konerding W, Baumhoff P, Kral A . Anodic Polarity Minimizes Facial Nerve Stimulation as a Side Effect of Cochlear Implantation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2022; 24(1):31-46. PMC: 9971531. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-022-00878-8. View

18.

Gartner L, Backus B, Le Goff N, Morgenstern A, Lenarz T, Buchner A . Cochlear Implant Stimulation Parameters Play a Key Role in Reducing Facial Nerve Stimulation. J Clin Med. 2023; 12(19). PMC: 10573649. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196194. View

19.

Gartner L, Bracker T, Kals M, Penninger R, Billinger-Finke M, Lenarz T . ARTFit-A Quick and Reliable Tool for Performing Initial Fittings in Users of MED-EL Cochlear Implants. Life (Basel). 2022; 12(2). PMC: 8879980. DOI: 10.3390/life12020269. View

20.

He S, Teagle H, Buchman C . The Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential: From Laboratory to Clinic. Front Neurosci. 2017; 11:339. PMC: 5481377. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00339. View