» Articles » PMID: 39966448

Developing Practical Machine Learning Survival Models to Identify High-risk Patients for In-hospital Mortality Following Traumatic Brain Injury

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2025 Feb 18
PMID 39966448
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Machine learning (ML) offers precise predictions and could improve patient care, potentially replacing traditional scoring systems. A retrospective study at Emtiaz Hospital analyzed 3,180 traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. Nineteen variables were assessed using ML algorithms to predict outcomes. Data preparation addressed missing values and balancing methods corrected imbalances. Model building involved training-test splits, survival analysis, and ML algorithms like Random Survival Forest (RSF) and Gradient Boosting. Feature importance was examined, with patient risk stratification guiding survival analysis. The best-performing model, RSF with ROS resampling, achieved the highest mean AUC of 0.80, the lowest IBS of 0.11, and IPCW c-index of 0.79, maintaining strong predictive ability over time. Top predictors for in-hospital mortality included age, GCS, pupil condition, PTT, IPH, and Rotterdam score, with high variations in predictive abilities over time. A risk stratification cut-off value of 63.34 separated patients into low and high-risk categories, with Kaplan-Meier curves showing significant survival differences. Our high-performing predictive model, built on first-day features, enables time-dependent risk assessment for tailored interventions and monitoring. Our study highlights the feasibility of AI tools in clinical settings, offering superior predictive accuracy and enhancing patient care for TBI cases.

References
1.
Dunn L, Fitzpatrick M, Beard D, Henry J . Patients with a head injury who "talk and die" in the 1990s. J Trauma. 2003; 54(3):497-502. DOI: 10.1097/01.TA.0000030627.71453.CD. View

2.
Hsu S, Chao E, Chen S, Hueng D, Lan H, Chiang H . Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury. J Pers Med. 2021; 11(11). PMC: 8618756. DOI: 10.3390/jpm11111144. View

3.
Tenovuo O, Diaz-Arrastia R, Goldstein L, Sharp D, van der Naalt J, Zasler N . Assessing the Severity of Traumatic Brain Injury-Time for a Change?. J Clin Med. 2021; 10(1). PMC: 7795933. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10010148. View

4.
Degos V, Lescot T, Zouaoui A, Hermann H, Preteux F, Coriat P . Computed tomography-estimated specific gravity of noncontused brain areas as a marker of severity in human traumatic brain injury. Anesth Analg. 2006; 103(5):1229-36. DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000237401.22688.22. View

5.
Deepika A, Prabhuraj A, Saikia A, Shukla D . Comparison of predictability of Marshall and Rotterdam CT scan scoring system in determining early mortality after traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015; 157(11):2033-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-015-2575-5. View