Advancements in Genome Editing Tools for Genetic Studies and Crop Improvement

Overview

Journal Front Plant Sci

Date 2025 Feb 18

PMID 39963359

Authors

Asadollah Ahmadikhah

Homa Zarabizadeh

Shahnoush Nayeri

Mohammad Sadegh Abbasi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The rapid increase in global population poses a significant challenge to food security, compounded by the adverse effects of climate change, which limit crop productivity through both biotic and abiotic stressors. Despite decades of progress in plant breeding and genetic engineering, the development of new crop varieties with desirable agronomic traits remains a time-consuming process. Traditional breeding methods often fall short of addressing the urgent need for improved crop varieties. Genome editing technologies, which enable precise modifications at specific genomic loci, have emerged as powerful tools for enhancing crop traits. These technologies, including RNA interference, Meganucleases, ZFNs, TALENs, and CRISPR/Cas systems, allow for the targeted insertion, deletion, or alteration of DNA fragments, facilitating improvements in traits such as herbicide and insect resistance, nutritional quality, and stress tolerance. Among these, CRISPR/Cas9 stands out for its simplicity, efficiency, and ability to reduce off-target effects, making it a valuable tool in both agricultural biotechnology and plant functional genomics. This review examines the functional mechanisms and applications of various genome editing technologies for crop improvement, highlighting their advantages and limitations. It also explores the ethical considerations associated with genome editing in agriculture and discusses the potential of these technologies to contribute to sustainable food production in the face of growing global challenges.

References

Mohr S, Perrimon N . RNAi screening: new approaches, understandings, and organisms. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2011; 3(2):145-58. PMC: 3249004. DOI: 10.1002/wrna.110. View

Huvenne H, Smagghe G . Mechanisms of dsRNA uptake in insects and potential of RNAi for pest control: a review. J Insect Physiol. 2009; 56(3):227-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2009.10.004. View

Boch J, Scholze H, Schornack S, Landgraf A, Hahn S, Kay S . Breaking the code of DNA binding specificity of TAL-type III effectors. Science. 2009; 326(5959):1509-12. DOI: 10.1126/science.1178811. View

Reyon D, Kirkpatrick J, Sander J, Zhang F, Voytas D, Joung J . ZFNGenome: a comprehensive resource for locating zinc finger nuclease target sites in model organisms. BMC Genomics. 2011; 12:83. PMC: 3042413. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-83. View

Baghban-Kohnehrouz B, Nayeri S . Design, simplified cloning, and analysis of multisite small interfering RNA-targeting cassettes. Mol Biol Res Commun. 2016; 5(1):31-43. PMC: 5019331. View

Curtin S, Zhang F, Sander J, Haun W, Starker C, Baltes N . Targeted mutagenesis of duplicated genes in soybean with zinc-finger nucleases. Plant Physiol. 2011; 156(2):466-73. PMC: 3177250. DOI: 10.1104/pp.111.172981. View

Duensing N, Sprink T, Parrott W, Fedorova M, Lema M, Wolt J . Novel Features and Considerations for ERA and Regulation of Crops Produced by Genome Editing. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018; 6:79. PMC: 6016284. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00079. View

Kim D, Rossi J . RNAi mechanisms and applications. Biotechniques. 2008; 44(5):613-6. PMC: 2727154. DOI: 10.2144/000112792. View

Osakabe K, Osakabe Y, Toki S . Site-directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis using custom-designed zinc finger nucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(26):12034-9. PMC: 2900650. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1000234107. View

10.

Pattanayak V, Lin S, Guilinger J, Ma E, Doudna J, Liu D . High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity. Nat Biotechnol. 2013; 31(9):839-43. PMC: 3782611. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2673. View

11.

Liu J, Chen J, Zheng X, Wu F, Lin Q, Heng Y . GW5 acts in the brassinosteroid signalling pathway to regulate grain width and weight in rice. Nat Plants. 2017; 3:17043. DOI: 10.1038/nplants.2017.43. View

12.

Deveau H, Garneau J, Moineau S . CRISPR/Cas system and its role in phage-bacteria interactions. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2010; 64:475-93. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134123. View

13.

Kim H, Kim J . A guide to genome engineering with programmable nucleases. Nat Rev Genet. 2014; 15(5):321-34. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3686. View

14.

Li T, Liu B, Spalding M, Weeks D, Yang B . High-efficiency TALEN-based gene editing produces disease-resistant rice. Nat Biotechnol. 2012; 30(5):390-2. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2199. View

15.

Wienert B, Wyman S, Richardson C, Yeh C, Akcakaya P, Porritt M . Unbiased detection of CRISPR off-targets in vivo using DISCOVER-Seq. Science. 2019; 364(6437):286-289. PMC: 6589096. DOI: 10.1126/science.aav9023. View

16.

de Pater S, Pinas J, Hooykaas P, van der Zaal B . ZFN-mediated gene targeting of the Arabidopsis protoporphyrinogen oxidase gene through Agrobacterium-mediated floral dip transformation. Plant Biotechnol J. 2013; 11(4):510-5. PMC: 3719044. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12040. View

17.

Rong Y, Titen S, Xie H, Golic M, Bastiani M, Bandyopadhyay P . Targeted mutagenesis by homologous recombination in D. melanogaster. Genes Dev. 2002; 16(12):1568-81. PMC: 186348. DOI: 10.1101/gad.986602. View

18.

Jia H, Zhang Y, Orbovic V, Xu J, White F, Jones J . Genome editing of the disease susceptibility gene CsLOB1 in citrus confers resistance to citrus canker. Plant Biotechnol J. 2016; 15(7):817-823. PMC: 5466436. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12677. View

19.

Van Eck J . Applying gene editing to tailor precise genetic modifications in plants. J Biol Chem. 2020; 295(38):13267-13276. PMC: 7504920. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.REV120.010850. View

20.

Clasen B, Stoddard T, Luo S, Demorest Z, Li J, Cedrone F . Improving cold storage and processing traits in potato through targeted gene knockout. Plant Biotechnol J. 2015; 14(1):169-76. PMC: 11389148. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12370. View