» Articles » PMID: 39962445

Randomized Controlled Trial on the Efficacy of Topical Urea-based Cream in Preventing Capecitabine-associated Hand-foot Syndrome

Overview
Journal BMC Cancer
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Oncology
Date 2025 Feb 18
PMID 39962445
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a common adverse event of capecitabine causing treatment modifications. Topical urea cream can reduce sorafenib-induced hand-foot skin reaction. However, its benefit in preventing capecitabine-associated HFS was not seen early in the course and had been unknown with long-term use. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of urea cream for HFS prophylaxis throughout capecitabine treatment.

Methods: Patients with cancer who received capecitabine were randomized (1:1) to receive usual care alone or in combination with urea-based cream. The incidence and degree of HFS were assessed at each capecitabine cycle. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with any grade HFS. The secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients with severe (≥ grade 3) HFS, modifications in capecitabine because of HFS, and HFS onset.

Results: After a median of six capecitabine cycles, any grade HFS was reported by 68 of 109 patients (62.4%) who received usual care and by 60 of 107 patients (56%) who used urea cream (p = 0.36). The patients who received usual care and urea cream had similar proportions of grade 3 HFS occurrence [52 (47.7%) vs. 44 (41.1%), respectively, p = 0.34] and needed capecitabine modification because of HFS [20 patients (18.3%) vs. 17 patients (15.9%), respectively, p = 0.89], as well as similar HFS onset.

Conclusions: Urea-based cream did not prevent capecitabine-associated HFS, reduce capecitabine modification, and delay HFS onset. However, it had a tendency to lessen HFS severity, especially in the later cycles of capecitabine.

Clinical Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05348278, registered on April 21, 2022.

References
1.
Fumoleau P, Largillier R, Clippe C, Dieras V, Orfeuvre H, Lesimple T . Multicentre, phase II study evaluating capecitabine monotherapy in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2004; 40(4):536-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2003.11.007. View

2.
Lee Y, Jung Y, Kim J, Cho S, Kim D, Kim M . Effect of urea cream on sorafenib-associated hand-foot skin reaction in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter, randomised, double-blind controlled study. Eur J Cancer. 2020; 140:19-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.09.012. View

3.
Kang Y, Lee S, Yoon D, Lee S, Chun Y, Kim M . Pyridoxine is not effective to prevent hand-foot syndrome associated with capecitabine therapy: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(24):3824-9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.1807. View

4.
Kluetz P, Chingos D, Basch E, Mitchell S . Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials: Measuring Symptomatic Adverse Events With the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016; 35:67-73. DOI: 10.1200/EDBK_159514. View

5.
Wolf S, Qin R, Menon S, Rowland Jr K, Thomas S, Delaune R . Placebo-controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of a urea/lactic acid-based topical keratolytic agent for prevention of capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome: North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study N05C5. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(35):5182-7. PMC: 3020691. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.1431. View