6.
Craciunas L, Gallos I, Chu J, Bourne T, Quenby S, Brosens J
. Conventional and modern markers of endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2019; 25(2):202-223.
DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmy044.
View
7.
Dauerman H
. Optical Coherence Tomography - Light and Truth. N Engl J Med. 2023; 389(16):1523-1525.
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMe2309710.
View
8.
Norwitz E, Schust D, Fisher S
. Implantation and the survival of early pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2002; 345(19):1400-8.
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra000763.
View
9.
Margalioth E, Ben-Chetrit A, Gal M, Eldar-Geva T
. Investigation and treatment of repeated implantation failure following IVF-ET. Hum Reprod. 2006; 21(12):3036-43.
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/del305.
View
10.
Wilcox A, Baird D, Weinberg C
. Time of implantation of the conceptus and loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340(23):1796-9.
DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199906103402304.
View
11.
Won J, Lee D, Lee Y, Hong S, Kim J, Kang Y
. The therapeutic effects and optimal timing of granulocyte colony stimulating factor intrauterine administration during IVF-ET. Life Sci. 2023; 317:121444.
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2023.121444.
View
12.
Li T, Liao R, Chan C, Greenblatt E
. Deep learning analysis of endometrial histology as a promising tool to predict the chance of pregnancy after frozen embryo transfers. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023; 40(4):901-910.
PMC: 10224884.
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02745-8.
View
13.
Gleicher N, Kushnir V, Barad D
. Worldwide decline of IVF birth rates and its probable causes. Hum Reprod Open. 2019; 2019(3):hoz017.
PMC: 6686986.
DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoz017.
View
14.
Aghajanova L, Hoffman J, Mok-Lin E, Herndon C
. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency and Fertility Needs. Reprod Sci. 2016; 24(3):428-434.
DOI: 10.1177/1933719116657193.
View
15.
Munro M
. Uterine polyps, adenomyosis, leiomyomas, and endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril. 2019; 111(4):629-640.
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.02.008.
View
16.
Fanchin R
. Introduction: Continuing story of premature progesterone elevation. Fertil Steril. 2018; 109(4):561-562.
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.02.134.
View
17.
Zhang C, Chen C, Wang J, Wang Y, Wen S, Cao Y
. An endometrial receptivity scoring system basing on the endometrial thickness, volume, echo, peristalsis, and blood flow evaluated by ultrasonography. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022; 13:907874.
PMC: 9395662.
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.907874.
View
18.
Prapas Y, Prapas N, Jones E, Duleba A, Olive D, Chatziparasidou A
. The window for embryo transfer in oocyte donation cycles depends on the duration of progesterone therapy. Hum Reprod. 1998; 13(3):720-3.
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.3.720.
View
19.
Revel A
. Defective endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril. 2012; 97(5):1028-32.
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.039.
View
20.
Li W, Liu M, Zhou M, Zhou X, Zhang D, Duan J
. Downregulation of SEPTIN11 inhibits endometrial epithelial cell adhesive function in patients with elevated peripheral blood natural killer cell counts. Reprod Biomed Online. 2023; 47(2):103203.
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.03.014.
View