Practical Challenges in Mediation Analysis: a Guide for Applied Researchers

Overview

Journal Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol

Date 2025 Feb 17

PMID 39958808

Authors

Megan S Schuler

Donna L Coffman

Elizabeth A Stuart

Trang Q Nguyen

Brian Vegetabile

Daniel F McCaffrey

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Mediation analysis is a statistical approach that can provide insights regarding the intermediary processes by which an intervention or exposure affects a given outcome. Mediation analyses rose to prominence, particularly in social science research, with the publication of Baron and Kenny's seminal paper and is now commonly applied in many research disciplines, including health services research. Despite the growth in popularity, applied researchers may still encounter challenges in terms of conducting mediation analyses in practice. In this paper, we provide an overview of conceptual and methodological challenges that researchers face when conducting mediation analyses. Specifically, we discuss the following key challenges: (1) Conceptually differentiating mediators from other "third variables," (2) Extending beyond the single mediator context, (3) Identifying appropriate datasets in which measurement and temporal ordering support the hypothesized mediation model, (4) Selecting mediation effects that reflect the scientific question of interest, (5) Assessing the validity of underlying assumptions of no omitted confounders, (6) Addressing measurement error regarding the mediator, and (7) Clearly reporting results from mediation analyses. We discuss each challenge and highlight ways in which the applied researcher can approach these challenges.

Citing Articles

Treatment stigma mediates relationships between morally injurious events and depression, PTSD and anxiety symptoms.

Haim-Nachum S, Lazarov A, Markowitz J, Bergman M, Levi-Belz Y, Lurie I Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025; 16(1):2471659.

PMID: 40063040 PMC: 11894749. DOI: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2471659.

References

Wickramarachchi D, Lim L, Sun B . Mediation analysis with multiple mediators under unmeasured mediator-outcome confounding. Stat Med. 2022; 42(4):422-432. DOI: 10.1002/sim.9624. View

MacKinnon D, Valente M, Gonzalez O . The Correspondence Between Causal and Traditional Mediation Analysis: the Link Is the Mediator by Treatment Interaction. Prev Sci. 2019; 21(2):147-157. PMC: 6992469. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-019-01076-4. View

Lange T, Rasmussen M, Thygesen L . Assessing natural direct and indirect effects through multiple pathways. Am J Epidemiol. 2013; 179(4):513-8. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwt270. View

Moerkerke B, Loeys T, Vansteelandt S . Structural equation modeling versus marginal structural modeling for assessing mediation in the presence of posttreatment confounding. Psychol Methods. 2015; 20(2):204-20. DOI: 10.1037/a0036368. View

Preacher K, Rucker D, Hayes A . Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions. Multivariate Behav Res. 2016; 42(1):185-227. DOI: 10.1080/00273170701341316. View

Daniel R, De Stavola B, Cousens S, Vansteelandt S . Causal mediation analysis with multiple mediators. Biometrics. 2014; 71(1):1-14. PMC: 4402024. DOI: 10.1111/biom.12248. View

Holmberg M, Andersen L . Collider Bias. JAMA. 2022; 327(13):1282-1283. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.1820. View

Preacher K, Hayes A . Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods. 2008; 40(3):879-91. DOI: 10.3758/brm.40.3.879. View

Steegen S, Tuerlinckx F, Gelman A, Vanpaemel W . Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016; 11(5):702-712. DOI: 10.1177/1745691616658637. View

10.

Valeri L, VanderWeele T . Mediation analysis allowing for exposure-mediator interactions and causal interpretation: theoretical assumptions and implementation with SAS and SPSS macros. Psychol Methods. 2013; 18(2):137-50. PMC: 3659198. DOI: 10.1037/a0031034. View

11.

Tchetgen Tchetgen E . On causal mediation analysis with a survival outcome. Int J Biostat. 2011; 7(1):Article 33. PMC: 3204669. DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1351. View

12.

Coffman D, Zhong W . Assessing mediation using marginal structural models in the presence of confounding and moderation. Psychol Methods. 2012; 17(4):642-64. PMC: 3553264. DOI: 10.1037/a0029311. View

13.

Imai K, Keele L, Tingley D . A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychol Methods. 2010; 15(4):309-34. DOI: 10.1037/a0020761. View

14.

le Cessie S, Debeij J, Rosendaal F, Cannegieter S, Vandenbroucke J . Quantification of bias in direct effects estimates due to different types of measurement error in the mediator. Epidemiology. 2012; 23(4):551-60. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318254f5de. View

15.

Valeri L, Lin X, VanderWeele T . Mediation analysis when a continuous mediator is measured with error and the outcome follows a generalized linear model. Stat Med. 2014; 33(28):4875-90. PMC: 4224977. DOI: 10.1002/sim.6295. View

16.

Vansteelandt S, Daniel R . Interventional Effects for Mediation Analysis with Multiple Mediators. Epidemiology. 2016; 28(2):258-265. PMC: 5289540. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000596. View

17.

Vo T, Superchi C, Boutron I, Vansteelandt S . The conduct and reporting of mediation analysis in recently published randomized controlled trials: results from a methodological systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019; 117:78-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.001. View

18.

Natarajan L, Pu M, Fan J, Levine R, Patterson R, Thomson C . Measurement error of dietary self-report in intervention trials. Am J Epidemiol. 2010; 172(7):819-27. PMC: 3025654. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwq216. View

19.

Hill A . THE ENVIRONMENT AND DISEASE: ASSOCIATION OR CAUSATION?. Proc R Soc Med. 1965; 58:295-300. PMC: 1898525. DOI: 10.1177/003591576505800503. View

20.

Johnson T, Fendrich M . Modeling sources of self-report bias in a survey of drug use epidemiology. Ann Epidemiol. 2005; 15(5):381-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.09.004. View