» Articles » PMID: 39958717

Mechanically Powered Negative Pressure Dressing Enhances Surgical Incision Cosmesis: A Randomized Trial

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2025 Feb 17
PMID 39958717
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cosmetic appearance of incisions remains one of the most important aspects of the patient recovery experience. Despite advances in surgery, scar prevention is the gold standard in improved results. Closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy has shown promise in decreasing surgical site infection and healing time. This study aimed to assess outcomes of primarily closed surgical incisions with mechanically powered negative pressure dressings (MP-NPDs) compared with standard dressings.

Methods: This study was a single-center, within-subjects, randomized controlled trial, in which each patient served as both the control and experimental arms. Laparoscopic/robotic port site incisions were randomized to control dressing or MP-NPD. Primary outcomes were cosmetic results at first clinic visit by blinded physicians and nonphysician observers.

Results: Forty patients with a total of 80 incisions were included in the analysis. The average scores for scar spread, erythema, dyspigmentation, scar hypertrophy, and overall impression were lower for the MP-NPD wounds. The only individual variable of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment Rating scale, in which there was no difference noted between the 2 groups, was the presence of suture marks. The average total Scar Cosmesis Assessment Rating score was significantly lower (more favorable) for the MP-NPD wounds compared with the control wounds (3.39 ± 3.18 versus 4.79 ± 3.18, respectively;  < 0.001).

Conclusions: The use of closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy with the application of a novel MP-NPD over surgical incisions resulted in clinical and statistically significant improvement in scar cosmesis in the early/intermediate postoperative period according to both physician and nonphysician observers.

References
1.
Bell L, McAdams T, Morgan R, PARSHLEY P, Pike R, Riggs P . Pruritus in burns: a descriptive study. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1988; 9(3):305-8. View

2.
Young V, Hutchison J . Insights into patient and clinician concerns about scar appearance: semiquantitative structured surveys. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124(1):256-265. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a80747. View

3.
Grauhan O, Navasardyan A, Hofmann M, Muller P, Stein J, Hetzer R . Prevention of poststernotomy wound infections in obese patients by negative pressure wound therapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012; 145(5):1387-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.040. View

4.
Robert R, Meyer W, Bishop S, Rosenberg L, Murphy L, Blakeney P . Disfiguring burn scars and adolescent self-esteem. Burns. 1999; 25(7):581-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0305-4179(99)00065-0. View

5.
Bonds A, Novick T, Dietert J, Araghizadeh F, Olson C . Incisional negative pressure wound therapy significantly reduces surgical site infection in open colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013; 56(12):1403-8. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182a39959. View