» Articles » PMID: 39956845

Spinal Deformity Transitional Care from Pediatric to Adult Population: a Descriptive Study

Overview
Journal Spine Deform
Publisher Springer Nature
Date 2025 Feb 16
PMID 39956845
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Spinal deformity can develop in childhood and adulthood. There is often a loss of follow-up for these patients during the transition to adulthood. The aim of this study was to describe the management of those patients. Hypothesis transitional care enhances patient's adherence to long-term follow-up.

Methods: A consultation was organized between two orthopedic surgery departments, one pediatric and the other adult, to ensure a transitional follow-up. All patients followed up in the pediatric department for spinal deformity between 2019 and 2021 were included (Ped group). Patients referred to the adult department were analyzed (Ped_Ad group). Data collected included type of deformity, age at first and last consultation, overall follow-up time, and number lost to follow-up (LTFU).

Results: Overall, 383 patients were included: 11% were referred to an adult center (Ped_Ad), and 89% remained in pediatrics (Ped). Age at first and last consultation was significantly higher in the Ped_Ad group. Mean follow-up time was 4 years in both groups. In the Ped group, 18% of patients had undergone surgery, versus 61% in the Ped_Ad group. The rate of LTFU was twice higher in the Ped group (25%) than in the Ped_Ad group (12%), but the difference was not significant (p = 0.07). Among LTFU, patients aged between 14 and 16 years were the most represented (53%), and they were most often unoperated patients in the Ped group.

Conclusion: When adult follow-up was organized, adherence to follow-up was better. This would enable patients to be managed earlier, in the event of worsening of an unoperated deformity.

Level Of Evidence: IV.

References
1.
Lonstein J . Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet. 1994; 344(8934):1407-12. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90572-x. View

2.
Duval-Beaupere G, Lamireau T . Scoliosis at less than 30 degrees. Properties of the evolutivity (risk of progression). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1985; 10(5):421-4. View

3.
Pesenti S, Jouve J, Morin C, Wolff S, Sales de Gauzy J, Chalopin A . Evolution of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: results of a multicenter study at 20 years' follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015; 101(5):619-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.05.004. View

4.
Yu S, Ng C, Cheung J, Shea G . Post-Maturity Progression in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Curves of 40° to 50°. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023; 105(4):277-285. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.22.00939. View

5.
Marty-Poumarat C, Scattin L, Marpeau M, Garreau de Loubresse C, Aegerter P . Natural history of progressive adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(11):1227-34. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000263328.89135.a6. View