Gingival Phenotype Prevalence of Lower Incisors and Associated Risk Indicators in the French Dental Student Population: a Cross-sectional Study

Overview

Journal Clin Oral Investig

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2025 Feb 14

PMID 39953292

Authors

Sophie-Myriam Dridi

Clement Ameline

Caterina Masucci

Eric Fontas

Carole Charavet

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the prevalence of the gingival phenotype in the mandibular incisor area and the associated risk indicators.

Materials And Methods: This cross-sectional study involved clinical examination to record main periodontal characteristics (gingival phenotypes) at the tooth level. Then, a phenotype at the subject level was defined as fragile (at least one thin phenotype on one of the four incisors) versus resistant (no thin phenotype on the four incisors). Furthermore, orthodontic parameters were assessed based on photographic examination. Two blinded periodontists and two blinded orthodontists were involved in the data collection. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were implemented.

Results: A total of 119 students were included, encompassing 476 incisors. The prevalence of gingival phenotypes at the tooth level was as follows: thin/high (63.9%), thick/high (36.3%), thin/reduced (5.9%), and thick/reduced (0.2%). At the subject level, the fragile phenotype predominated (81.5%) and showed a significant correlation with the visibility of roots prominence (OR = 4.09, 95% CI: 1.47-11.41, p = 0.007).

Conclusions: Considering the conditions of this study, in the mandibular incisor area, the thin/high gingival phenotype exhibited the highest prevalence at the tooth level. At the subject level, the presence of visible roots prominence was identified as the only significant risk indicator associated with the fragile phenotype.

Clinical Relevance: General practitioners, periodontists and orthodontists should consider the mandibular incisor sector as a vulnerable area. Categorizing the overall gingival phénotype into 4 types improves the diagnostic approach and allows better identification of high-risk phenotypes, especially in cases requiring multidisciplinary management.

Clinicaltrial:

Gov Record: Number NCT05813444.

References

Cortellini P, Bissada N . Mucogingival conditions in the natural dentition: Narrative review, case definitions, and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol. 2018; 89 Suppl 1:S204-S213. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.16-0671. View

Zweers J, Thomas R, Slot D, Weisgold A, Van der Weijden F . Characteristics of periodontal biotype, its dimensions, associations and prevalence: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 41(10):958-71. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12275. View

Malpartida-Carrillo V, Tinedo-Lopez P, Guerrero M, Amaya-Pajares S, Ozcan M, Rosing C . Periodontal phenotype: A review of historical and current classifications evaluating different methods and characteristics. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020; 33(3):432-445. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12661. View

Kim D, Bassir S, Nguyen T . Effect of gingival phenotype on the maintenance of periodontal health: An American Academy of Periodontology best evidence review. J Periodontol. 2019; 91(3):311-338. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.19-0337. View

Koppolu P, Al Arabi A, Al Khayri M, Alfaraj F, Alsafwani W, Alhozaimi S . Correlation between Gingival Thickness and Occurrence of Gingival Recession. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023; 15(Suppl 1):S495-S501. PMC: 10466527. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_585_22. View

Alsalhi R, Tabasum S . Prevalence of gingival recession and its correlation with gingival phenotype in mandibular incisors region of orthodontically treated female patients: A cross-sectional study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2021; 25(4):341-346. PMC: 8336773. DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_526_20. View

Charavet C, Israel N, Vives F, Dridi S . Importance of Early Detection of Wire Syndrome: A Case Series Illustrating the Main Stages of the Clinical Gradient. Clin Pract. 2023; 13(5):1100-1110. PMC: 10514803. DOI: 10.3390/clinpract13050098. View

Scheyer E, Sanz M, Dibart S, Greenwell H, John V, Kim D . Periodontal soft tissue non-root coverage procedures: a consensus report from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol. 2015; 86(2 Suppl):S73-6. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2015.140377. View

Barootchi S, Tavelli L, Zucchelli G, Giannobile W, Wang H . Gingival phenotype modification therapies on natural teeth: A network meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2020; 91(11):1386-1399. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.19-0715. View

10.

Dridi S, Ameline C, Heurtebise J, Vincent-Bugnas S, Charavet C . Prevalence of the Gingival Phenotype in Adults and Associated Risk Factors: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Clin Pract. 2024; 14(3):801-833. PMC: 11130957. DOI: 10.3390/clinpract14030064. View

11.

Mayhew D, Mendonca V, Murthy B . A review of ASA physical status - historical perspectives and modern developments. Anaesthesia. 2019; 74(3):373-379. DOI: 10.1111/anae.14569. View

12.

Chapple I, Mealey B, Van Dyke T, Bartold P, Dommisch H, Eickholz P . Periodontal health and gingival diseases and conditions on an intact and a reduced periodontium: Consensus report of workgroup 1 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Periodontol. 2018; 89 Suppl 1:S74-S84. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.17-0719. View

13.

Tonetti M, Greenwell H, Kornman K . Staging and grading of periodontitis: Framework and proposal of a new classification and case definition. J Periodontol. 2018; 89 Suppl 1:S159-S172. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.18-0006. View

14.

Fitzpatrick T . The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol. 1988; 124(6):869-71. DOI: 10.1001/archderm.124.6.869. View

15.

Maynard Jr J, Wilson R . Diagnosis and management of mucogingival problems in children. Dent Clin North Am. 1980; 24(4):683-703. View

16.

Cairo F, Nieri M, Cincinelli S, Mervelt J, Pagliaro U . The interproximal clinical attachment level to classify gingival recessions and predict root coverage outcomes: an explorative and reliability study. J Clin Periodontol. 2011; 38(7):661-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01732.x. View

17.

De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J . The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Periodontol. 2009; 36(5):428-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01398.x. View

18.

Fischer K, Buchel J, Kauffmann F, Heumann C, Friedmann A, Schmidlin P . Gingival phenotype distribution in young Caucasian women and men - An investigative study. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021; 8(1):374-379. PMC: 8874113. DOI: 10.1002/cre2.482. View

19.

Schwarz L, Andrukhov O, Rausch M, Rausch-Fan X, Jonke E . Difference in Buccal Gingival Thickness between the Mandible and Maxilla in the Aesthetic Zone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2024; 13(6). PMC: 10971348. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13061789. View

20.

Vignoletti F, di Martino M, Clementini M, Di Domenico G, de Sanctis M . Prevalence and risk indicators of gingival recessions in an Italian school of dentistry and dental hygiene: a cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Investig. 2019; 24(2):991-1000. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-02996-9. View