Photobiomodulation (100 MW) Caution Applied to Tattooed Skin: a Cross-sectional Study

Overview

Journal Arch Dermatol Res

Specialty Dermatology

Date 2025 Feb 14

PMID 39951172

Authors

Larissa Oliveira Silva

Ana Julia da Silva

Adrian Thives de Bona Sartor

Guilherme Martins Pedro

Heloyse Uliam Kuriki

Lais Mara Siqueira das Neves

Rafael Inacio Barbosa

Alexandre Marcio Marcolino

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Photobiomodulation is a technique that can modulate cellular processes and promote therapeutic effects, with the vast majority of applications being painless and nonperceptible. This study aims to determine whether tattooed skin influences cutaneous sensory perception during photobiomodulation application. A cross-sectional study. Participants: 30 participants with tattooed skin on some body regions, mainly on the upper limbs. Data collection was performed in a controlled laboratory environment by a previously trained evaluator. Four modes of irradiation were applied to the skin of the participants, and their sensory perceptions were analyzed with the average time and energy for participants to manifest during irradiations of the PBM. The interventions showed statistically significant differences when comparing the different application mode groups in terms of intervention time with the placebo model. There was an average time and energy during the irradiations: cluster 12s (1.2 J), 660 nm 21s (2.1 J) and 808 nm 14s (1.4 J) until the participants manifested. As a limitation of the study, we can describe the non-observation of skin types I and VI according to the Fitzpatrick scale. This study was evident that tattoos may affect cutaneous sensory perception during photobiomodulation irradiation in all application modes, and the first manifestations reported were: warmth, tingling, and heating.

References

Strandt H, Voluzan O, Niedermair T, Ritter U, Thalhamer J, Malissen B . Macrophages and Fibroblasts Differentially Contribute to Tattoo Stability. Dermatology. 2020; 237(2):296-302. DOI: 10.1159/000506540. View

Hendler K, Canever J, de Souza L, das Neves L, Fonseca M, Kuriki H . Comparison of photobiomodulation in the treatment of skin injury with an open wound in mice. Lasers Med Sci. 2021; 36(9):1845-1854. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-020-03216-7. View

das Neves L, Leite G, Marcolino A, Pinfildi C, Garcia S, de Araujo J . Laser photobiomodulation (830 and 660 nm) in mast cells, VEGF, FGF, and CD34 of the musculocutaneous flap in rats submitted to nicotine. Lasers Med Sci. 2016; 32(2):335-341. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-016-2118-1. View

Vieceli A, Martins J, Hendler K, Santos A, das Neves L, Barbosa R . Effectiveness of electrophysical agents for treating pressure injuries: a systematic review. Lasers Med Sci. 2022; 37(9):3363-3377. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-022-03648-3. View

Heywood W, Patrick K, Smith A, Simpson J, Pitts M, Richters J . Who gets tattoos? Demographic and behavioral correlates of ever being tattooed in a representative sample of men and women. Ann Epidemiol. 2011; 22(1):51-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.10.005. View

Bjordal J, Johnson M, Iversen V, Aimbire F, Lopes-Martins R . Low-level laser therapy in acute pain: a systematic review of possible mechanisms of action and clinical effects in randomized placebo-controlled trials. Photomed Laser Surg. 2006; 24(2):158-68. DOI: 10.1089/pho.2006.24.158. View

Leite G, das Neves L, Silva C, Guirro R, de Souza T, de Souza A . Photobiomodulation laser and pulsed electrical field increase the viability of the musculocutaneous flap in diabetic rats. Lasers Med Sci. 2017; 32(3):641-648. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-017-2160-7. View

Dos Santos Grandinetti V, Miranda E, Johnson D, de Paiva P, Tomazoni S, Vanin A . The thermal impact of phototherapy with concurrent super-pulsed lasers and red and infrared LEDs on human skin. Lasers Med Sci. 2015; 30(5):1575-81. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-015-1755-0. View

Engel E, Vasold R, Santarelli F, Maisch T, Gopee N, Howard P . Tattooing of skin results in transportation and light-induced decomposition of tattoo pigments--a first quantification in vivo using a mouse model. Exp Dermatol. 2009; 19(1):54-60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2009.00925.x. View

11.

Du X, Zhou H, Wang Z, Liu J, Wang J, Li D . Comparative study of 1064 nm nanosecond, 1064 nm picosecond, 755 nm, and 595 nm lasers for tattoo removal: An essential role by macrophage. Lasers Surg Med. 2022; 54(5):737-746. DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23535. View

12.

Joensen J, Demmink J, Johnson M, Iversen V, Lopes-Martins R, Bjordal J . The thermal effects of therapeutic lasers with 810 and 904 nm wavelengths on human skin. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011; 29(3):145-53. DOI: 10.1089/pho.2010.2793. View

13.

Ingenito T . Low level light therapy and tattoos: A case report. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2016; 20(4):748-750. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.04.016. View

14.

Vasold R, Naarmann N, Ulrich H, Fischer D, Konig B, Landthaler M . Tattoo pigments are cleaved by laser light-the chemical analysis in vitro provide evidence for hazardous compounds. Photochem Photobiol. 2004; 80(2):185-90. DOI: 10.1562/2004-05-17-RA-170. View

15.

Hogsberg T, Loeschner K, Lof D, Serup J . Tattoo inks in general usage contain nanoparticles. Br J Dermatol. 2011; 165(6):1210-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10561.x. View

16.

Souza-Barros L, Dhaidan G, Maunula M, Solomon V, Gabison S, Lilge L . Skin color and tissue thickness effects on transmittance, reflectance, and skin temperature when using 635 and 808 nm lasers in low intensity therapeutics. Lasers Surg Med. 2017; 50(4):291-301. DOI: 10.1002/lsm.22760. View

17.

Austin E, Geisler A, Nguyen J, Kohli I, Hamzavi I, Lim H . Visible light. Part I: Properties and cutaneous effects of visible light. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021; 84(5):1219-1231. PMC: 8887026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.02.048. View

18.

Mineroff J, Maghfour J, Ozog D, Lim H, Kohli I, Jagdeo J . Photobiomodulation CME part II: Clinical applications in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024; 91(5):805-815. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.10.074. View