» Articles » PMID: 39950716

Tumor Mutation Burden Survey of AACR GENIE Database Revealed NTRK (NTRK+) and RET (RET+) Fusions Positive Colorectal Carcinoma (CRC) As Distinct Subsets

Overview
Journal Cancer Med
Specialty Oncology
Date 2025 Feb 14
PMID 39950716
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of NTRK fusion (NTRK+) and RET fusion (RET+) positive solid tumors in a tumor-agnostic manner. However, the objective response rate was the lowest among entrectinib-treated NTRK+ colorectal cancer (CRC) (20%) and selpercatinib-treated RET+ CRC (20%) among all NTRK+, and RET+ solid tumors, respectively.

Methods: We compared tumor mutation burden (TMB) in NTRK+/RET+ CRC with all other NTRK+ and RET+ solid tumors using the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) GENIE database (Version 13.0).

Results: We identified 14,812 unique CRC patients. Considering only samples with identified fusion partners, the mean TMB was 66.6 ± 15.8 (mt/MB) for NTRK+ CRC (N = 9) and 35 ± 11.5 for RET+ CRC (N = 4), which were significantly higher when compared to the mean number of 6.2 ± 5.4 of TMB for all other RTK+ CRC (N = 30, p < 0.05). Furthermore, NTRK+ CRC harbored significantly higher TMB than RET+ CRC (p = 0.003). In comparison, the mean TMB was 4.0 ± 1.9 for RET+ NSCLC (N = 65) and 2.6 ± 1.6 for RET+ Thyroid cancer (N = 52). Mean TMB for all other NTRK+ solid tumors was < 11 and significantly lower than the mean TMB of NTRK+ CRC. 1482 (10.0%) CRC patients had their MSI status reported. Three out of three NTRK+ CRC patients with known MSI status were all dMMR (100%). 0 out of 12 non-NTRK/non-RET RTK+ CRC patients were dMMR (0%).

Conclusions: NRTK+ and RET+ CRC possess significantly higher TMB than other RTK+ CRC or NTRK+/RET+ non-CRC solid tumors. TMB testing should be routinely done in MSI-H CRC, and TMB ≥ 35 mut/MB samples should be screened for NTRK and RET fusions as an enrichment strategy to provide additional treatment for NTRK+ and RET+ CRC patients.

References
1.
Nagasaka M, Brazel D, Baca Y, Xiu J, Al-Hallak M, Kim C . Pan-tumor survey of RET fusions as detected by next-generation RNA sequencing identified RET fusion positive colorectal carcinoma as a unique molecular subset. Transl Oncol. 2023; 36:101744. PMC: 10410168. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101744. View

2.
Andre T, Shiu K, Kim T, Jensen B, Jensen L, Punt C . Pembrolizumab in Microsatellite-Instability-High Advanced Colorectal Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383(23):2207-2218. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2017699. View

3.
Gouda M, Nelson B, Buschhorn L, Wahida A, Subbiah V . Tumor-Agnostic Precision Medicine from the AACR GENIE Database: Clinical Implications. Clin Cancer Res. 2023; 29(15):2753-2760. PMC: 10390861. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-0090. View

4.
Parikh A, He Y, Hong T, Corcoran R, Clark J, Ryan D . Analysis of DNA Damage Response Gene Alterations and Tumor Mutational Burden Across 17,486 Tubular Gastrointestinal Carcinomas: Implications for Therapy. Oncologist. 2019; 24(10):1340-1347. PMC: 6795150. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0034. View

5.
Elez E, Kopetz S, Tabernero J, Bekaii-Saab T, Taieb J, Yoshino T . SEAMARK: phase II study of first-line encorafenib and cetuximab plus pembrolizumab for MSI-H/dMMR V600E-mutant mCRC. Future Oncol. 2023; 20(11):653-663. DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-1249. View