» Articles » PMID: 39941600

Four-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Pulmonary Flow Imaging for Assessing Pulmonary Vasculopathy in Patients with Postcapillary Pulmonary Hypertension

Abstract

: Noninvasive techniques for diagnosing combined postcapillary pulmonary hypertension (CpcPH) are unavailable. : To assess the diagnostic performance of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-based four-dimensional (4D)-flow analysis in identifying CpcPH. : Prospective observational study of heart failure (HF) patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension (PH) who underwent simultaneous CMR and right heart catheterization. The 4D-flow biomarkers were calculated using an automatic pipeline. A predictive model including 4D-flow biomarkers associated with CpcPH with a -value < 0.20 was built to determine the diagnostic performance of 4D-flow analysis to identify CpcPH. : A total of 46 HF patients (55.4 ± 14 years, 63% male) with confirmed PH (19 [41%] isolated postcapillary PH [IpcPH], 27 [59%] CpcPH) were included. No differences were found in baseline characteristics, echocardiography, or CMR anatomical and functional parameters, except for a higher Doppler-estimated systolic pulmonary pressure and larger pulmonary artery in CpcPH patients. The 4D-flow CMR analysis was performed in 31 patients (67%). The maximal peak velocity (67.1 [62.2-77.5] cm/s-IpcPH vs. 58.2 [45.8-66.0] cm/s-CpcPH; = 0.021) and maximal helicity (339.9 [290.0-391.8]) cm/s-IpcPH vs. 226.0 (173.5-343.7) cm/s-CpcPH; = 0.026) were significantly lower in patients with CpcPH. A maximal multivariable model including sex, maximal average, and peak velocities, Reynolds number, flow rate, and helicity showed fair diagnostic performance (area under the curve: 0.768 [95%-CI: 0.572-0.963]; sensitivity: 100%; specificity: 55%). : In HF patients with PH, 4D-flow-derived maximal peak velocity and maximal helicity were significantly lower in CpcPH patients. A multiparametric model including maximal 4D-flow-derived biomarkers showed good diagnostic performance for identifying CpcPH.

References
1.
Nitsche C, Kammerlander A, Binder C, Duca F, Aschauer S, Koschutnik M . Native T1 time of right ventricular insertion points by cardiac magnetic resonance: relation with invasive haemodynamics and outcome in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 21(6):683-691. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jez221. View

2.
Ponikowski P, Voors A, Anker S, Bueno H, Cleland J, Coats A . 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special.... Eur Heart J. 2016; 37(27):2129-2200. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128. View

3.
Hur D, Sugeng L . Non-invasive Multimodality Cardiovascular Imaging of the Right Heart and Pulmonary Circulation in Pulmonary Hypertension. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2019; 6:24. PMC: 6427926. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00024. View

4.
Sanz J, Garcia-Alvarez A, Fernandez-Friera L, Nair A, Mirelis J, Sawit S . Right ventriculo-arterial coupling in pulmonary hypertension: a magnetic resonance study. Heart. 2011; 98(3):238-43. DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300462. View

5.
Hoeper M, Lee S, Voswinckel R, Palazzini M, Jais X, Marinelli A . Complications of right heart catheterization procedures in patients with pulmonary hypertension in experienced centers. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48(12):2546-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.07.061. View