» Articles » PMID: 39939896

Validation of Korean Version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen (K-OCS), a Post Stroke-Specific Cognitive Screening Tool

Overview
Journal Ann Rehabil Med
Date 2025 Feb 12
PMID 39939896
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To establish and evaluate the validity of the recently developed Korean version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen (K-OCS), this study verified its reliability, validity, and diagnostic accuracy.

Methods: Between November 2021 and December 2023, we recruited 72 patients with stroke from our hospital who agreed to participate in the study. The patients were repeatedly tested using K-OCS by the same or different assessors to estimate inter- and intra-rater reliability. To demonstrate the validity and usability of K-OCS, the test results of screening tools currently used in clinical practice, including the Korean-Mini Mental State Examination and the Korean version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, were used in comparison analyses.

Results: The subtests of K-OCS demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC]=0.914-0.998) and test-retest reliability (ICC=0.913-0.994). We found moderate-to-strong correlations for convergent validity for the subsets (r=0.378- 0.979, p<0.01), and low-to-moderate discriminant validity correlations. The optimal cut-offs estimated for the subtests of the K-OCS showed a good-to-high range of specificity (94.8%- 100%). The positive predictive value was 58.2%-100% and negative predictive value was 65.6%-98.4%. Sensitivity was estimated at 25.6%-86.9%.

Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that K-OCS is a reliable and valid tool for screening cognitive impairment in patients post-stroke.

References
1.
Mancuso M, Demeyere N, Abbruzzese L, Damora A, Varalta V, Pirrotta F . Using the Oxford Cognitive Screen to Detect Cognitive Impairment in Stroke Patients: A Comparison with the Mini-Mental State Examination. Front Neurol. 2018; 9:101. PMC: 5836594. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00101. View

2.
Koo T, Li M . A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15(2):155-63. PMC: 4913118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. View

3.
Sanctuary C, Hewitt L, Demeyere N, Kankkunen K, Oxenham D, Simpson D . The Oxford Cognitive Screen for use with Australian people after stroke (OCS-AU): The adaptation process and determining cut scores for cognitive impairment using a cross-sectional normative study. Aust Occup Ther J. 2022; 70(1):73-85. PMC: 10087605. DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12838. View

4.
Bickerton W, Riddoch M, Samson D, Bahrami Balani A, Mistry B, Humphreys G . Systematic assessment of apraxia and functional predictions from the Birmingham Cognitive Screen. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012; 83(5):513-21. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2011-300968. View

5.
Pendlebury S, Rothwell P . Incidence and prevalence of dementia associated with transient ischaemic attack and stroke: analysis of the population-based Oxford Vascular Study. Lancet Neurol. 2019; 18(3):248-258. PMC: 6390174. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30442-3. View