» Articles » PMID: 39939392

Long Term Analysis of Microbiological Isolates and Antibiotic Susceptibilities in Acute-onset Postoperative Endophthalmitis: a UK Multicentre Study

Overview
Journal Eye (Lond)
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2025 Feb 12
PMID 39939392
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To review the trend of microbial isolates for postoperative endophthalmitis (POE) in the United Kingdom (UK) and determine the sensitivity to current empirical intravitreal antibiotic treatment.

Methods: We conducted a long term multicentre consecutive case review of POE across 3 geographically distant tertiary eye centres in the UK: Sunderland Eye Infirmary (2000-2022), Oxford Eye Hospital (2016-2022), and Southampton General Hospital (2016-2022). Data on the microbial samples taken and results including sensitivities to antibiotics agents given were collected. Poisson regression was used to analyse microbial trends and outcomes were considered statistically significant at a level of p < 0.05.

Results: 179 consecutive eyes of 177 patients with POE met our inclusion criteria. The most common primary procedure was phacoemulsification and IOL insertion followed by intravitreal injections. 104 (58.1%) were culture positive and most were Gram-positive bacteria (85, 81.7%). The microbial trend consistently showed Staphylococcus epidermidis and unspecified coagulase-negative Staphylococci to be the most prevalent pathogens. Poisson regression showed no statistically significant change in any of the bacterial isolates over our study period. Antibiotic sensitivity data was available for 74% of the culture positive samples (77/104). All Gram-positive bacteria (68/68, 100%) and most (8/9, 88.9%) Gram-negative bacteria were sensitive to the empirical antibiotics (Vancomycin and Ceftazidime/Amikacin) given at presentation.

Conclusions: Most of the bacterial isolates causing POE in the UK are Gram-positive bacteria, and the trend has remained stable over more than two decades. Current empirical treatment with intravitreal Vancomycin and Ceftazidime/Amikacin provides effective broad coverage for the vast majority of cases.

References
1.
Behndig A, Cochener B, Guell J, Kodjikian L, Mencucci R, Nuijts R . Endophthalmitis prophylaxis in cataract surgery: overview of current practice patterns in 9 European countries. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013; 39(9):1421-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.06.014. View

2.
Sadaka A, Durand M, Gilmore M . Bacterial endophthalmitis in the age of outpatient intravitreal therapies and cataract surgeries: host-microbe interactions in intraocular infection. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2012; 31(4):316-31. PMC: 3361607. DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.03.004. View

3.
Nentwich M, Ta C, Kreutzer T, Li B, Schwarzbach F, Yactayo-Miranda Y . Incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis from 1990 to 2009 using povidone-iodine but no intracameral antibiotics at a single academic institution. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014; 41(1):58-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.04.040. View

4.
Asencio M, Huertas M, Carranza R, Tenias J, Celis J, Gonzalez-Del Valle F . A case-control study of post-operative endophthalmitis diagnosed at a Spanish hospital over a 13-year-period. Epidemiol Infect. 2014; 143(1):178-83. PMC: 9206787. DOI: 10.1017/S095026881400034X. View

5.
Daien V, Papinaud L, Gillies M, Domerg C, Nagot N, Lacombe S . Effectiveness and Safety of an Intracameral Injection of Cefuroxime for the Prevention of Endophthalmitis After Cataract Surgery With or Without Perioperative Capsular Rupture. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016; 134(7):810-6. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.1351. View