Feasibility of a Cinematic-Virtual Reality Program Educating Health Professional Students About the Complexity of Geriatric Care: Pilot Pre-Post Study

Overview

Journal JMIR Aging

Specialty Geriatrics

Date 2025 Feb 12

PMID 39937111

Authors

Elizabeth A Beverly

Samuel Miller

Matthew Love

Carrie Love

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The US population is aging. With this demographic shift, more older adults will be living with chronic conditions and geriatric syndromes. To prepare the next generation of health care professionals for this aging population, we need to provide training that captures the complexity of geriatric care.

Objective: This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility of the cinematic-virtual reality (cine-VR) training in the complexity of geriatric care. We measured changes in attitudes to disability, self-efficacy to identify and manage elder abuse and neglect, and empathy before and after participating in the training program.

Methods: We conducted a single-arm, pretest-posttest pilot study to assess the feasibility of a cine-VR training and measure changes in attitudes to disability, self-efficacy to identify and manage elder abuse and neglect, and empathy. Health professional students from a large university in the Midwest were invited to participate in 1 of 4 cine-VR trainings. Participants completed 3 surveys before and after the cine-VR training. We performed paired t tests to examine changes in these constructs before and after the training.

Results: A total of 65 health professional students participated in and completed the full cine-VR training for 100% retention. Participants did not report any technological difficulties or adverse effects from wearing the head-mounted displays or viewing the 360-degree video. Out of the 65 participants, 48 completed the pre- and postassessments. We observed an increase in awareness of discrimination towards people with disability (t47=-3.97; P<.001). In addition, we observed significant improvements in self-efficacy to identify and manage elder abuse and neglect (t47=-3.36; P=.002). Finally, we observed an increase in participants' empathy (t47=-2.33; P=.02).

Conclusions: We demonstrated that our cine-VR training program was feasible and acceptable to health professional students at our Midwestern university. Findings suggest that the cine-VR training increased awareness of discrimination towards people with disabilities, improved self-efficacy to identify and manage elder abuse and neglect, and increased empathy. Future research using a randomized controlled trial design with a larger, more diverse sample and a proper control condition is needed to confirm the effectiveness of our cine-VR training.

References

Tong X, Gromala D, Kiaei Ziabari S, Shaw C . Designing a Virtual Reality Game for Promoting Empathy Toward Patients With Chronic Pain: Feasibility and Usability Study. JMIR Serious Games. 2020; 8(3):e17354. PMC: 7442937. DOI: 10.2196/17354. View

May W, Park J, Lee J . A ten-year review of the literature on the use of standardized patients in teaching and learning: 1996-2005. Med Teach. 2009; 31(6):487-92. DOI: 10.1080/01421590802530898. View

Issenberg S, McGaghie W, Petrusa E, Gordon D, Scalese R . Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005; 27(1):10-28. DOI: 10.1080/01421590500046924. View

Simmons J, Wenemark M, Ludvigsson M . Development and validation of REAGERA-P, a new questionnaire to evaluate health care provider preparedness to identify and manage elder abuse. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021; 21(1):473. PMC: 8131191. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06469-2. View

Lancaster G, Dodd S, Williamson P . Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004; 10(2):307-12. DOI: 10.1111/j..2002.384.doc.x. View

Power M, Green A . The Attitudes to Disability Scale (ADS): development and psychometric properties. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010; 54(9):860-74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01317.x. View

Ziv A, Wolpe P, Small S, Glick S . Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. Acad Med. 2003; 78(8):783-8. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200308000-00006. View

Urtamo A, Jyvakorpi S, Strandberg T . Definitions of successful ageing: a brief review of a multidimensional concept. Acta Biomed. 2019; 90(2):359-363. PMC: 6776218. DOI: 10.23750/abm.v90i2.8376. View

Stierman B, Afful J, Carroll M, Chen T, Davy O, Fink S . National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017-March 2020 Prepandemic Data Files-Development of Files and Prevalence Estimates for Selected Health Outcomes. Natl Health Stat Report. 2024; (158). PMC: 11513744. DOI: 10.15620/cdc:106273. View

10.

Beverly E, Rigot B, Love C, Love M . Perspectives of 360-Degree Cinematic Virtual Reality: Interview Study Among Health Care Professionals. JMIR Med Educ. 2022; 8(2):e32657. PMC: 9107048. DOI: 10.2196/32657. View

11.

Halpern J . What is clinical empathy?. J Gen Intern Med. 2003; 18(8):670-4. PMC: 1494899. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21017.x. View

12.

Gaba D . The future vision of simulation in health care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004; 13 Suppl 1:i2-10. PMC: 1765792. DOI: 10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_1.i2. View

13.

Okuda Y, Bryson E, DeMaria Jr S, Jacobson L, Quinones J, Shen B . The utility of simulation in medical education: what is the evidence?. Mt Sinai J Med. 2009; 76(4):330-43. DOI: 10.1002/msj.20127. View

14.

Tyng C, Amin H, Saad M, Malik A . The Influences of Emotion on Learning and Memory. Front Psychol. 2017; 8:1454. PMC: 5573739. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01454. View

15.

Beverly E, Love C, Love M, Lammert L, Bowditch J . Cinematic Virtual Reality for Educating Health Care Providers About Type 2 Diabetes, Disability, and Elder Abuse and Neglect: A Pilot Study. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023; 17(5):1160-1171. PMC: 10563529. DOI: 10.1177/19322968231171586. View

16.

Grassini S, Laumann K, Skogstad M . The Use of Virtual Reality Alone Does Not Promote Training Performance (but Sense of Presence Does). Front Psychol. 2020; 11:1743. PMC: 7379892. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01743. View

17.

Noto S . Perspectives on Aging and Quality of Life. Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(15). PMC: 10418952. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11152131. View

18.

Gordon J, Wilkerson W, Shaffer D, Armstrong E . "Practicing" medicine without risk: students' and educators' responses to high-fidelity patient simulation. Acad Med. 2001; 76(5):469-72. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200105000-00019. View

19.

ORourke L, Morrison M, Grimsley A, Cotter V . High-fidelity simulation and nurse clinical competence-An integrative review. J Clin Nurs. 2021; 32(9-10):1549-1555. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16028. View

20.

Kyaw B, Saxena N, Posadzki P, Vseteckova J, Nikolaou C, George P . Virtual Reality for Health Professions Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21(1):e12959. PMC: 6362387. DOI: 10.2196/12959. View