» Articles » PMID: 39936808

Photobiomodulation on Vocal Training and Rehabilitation: Delphi Consensus Based on Experts

Overview
Journal Codas
Date 2025 Feb 12
PMID 39936808
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To develop a consensus among speech-language pathologists who are voice specialists regarding the criteria for recommending and using photobiomodulation in the context of vocal therapy and training.

Methods: Seven speech-language pathologists, experts in voice, and with experience in using photobiomodulation in vocal therapy and training participated. The Delphi technique was used to achieve consensus from a panel of experts accessed independently in two phases of collection. In Phase 1, the experts were contacted individually and participated in an interview with 12 questions to gather opinions on the use of photobiomodulation in the investigated context. The experts' responses were used to construct a questionnaire with 55 items presented as statements. The experts were asked to analyze each item and indicate their level of agreement on a five-point Likert scale. The content validity coefficient (CVC) was used to investigate the degree of agreement among the judges and to select the final items of the consensus.

Results: Consensus was reached among the experts on 34 items investigated in this study, with a CVC ≥ 0.75. It was observed that 31 items achieved an excellent CVC (≥ 0.78), 14 items with a good CVC (0.60 ≥ CVC ≤ 0.77) and 10 items with a poor CVC (≤ 0.59). The total CVC was considered excellent, with a value of 0.78.

Conclusion: There was a consensus among experts about the use of photobiomodulation in vocal habilitation and rehabilitation. It has the potential to improve the criteria for prescribing and using this device by speech-language pathologists. The findings may be useful to improve the criteria for prescribing and the use of this device by speech-language pathologists, in addition to subsidizing the development of future research and clinical recommendations in the area.

References
1.
Batista D, Lopes L, Almeida A, Siqueira L, Ribeiro V . What Factors Determine the Use of Volitional and Non-Volitional Devices in Vocal Interventions Performed by Brazilian Speech-Language Pathologists?. J Voice. 2023; . DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.10.026. View

2.
Robijns J, Nair R, Lodewijckx J, Arany P, Barasch A, Bjordal J . Photobiomodulation therapy in management of cancer therapy-induced side effects: WALT position paper 2022. Front Oncol. 2022; 12:927685. PMC: 9468822. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.927685. View

3.
Pinto H, Vanin A, Miranda E, Tomazoni S, Johnson D, Albuquerque-Pontes G . Photobiomodulation Therapy Improves Performance and Accelerates Recovery of High-Level Rugby Players in Field Test: A Randomized, Crossover, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study. J Strength Cond Res. 2016; 30(12):3329-3338. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001439. View

4.
Kagan L, Heaton J . The Effectiveness of Low-Level Light Therapy in Attenuating Vocal Fatigue. J Voice. 2016; 31(3):384.e15-384.e23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.09.004. View

5.
Van Stan J, Whyte J, Duffy J, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, Doyle P, Gherson S . Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System: Methodology to Identify and Describe Unique Targets and Ingredients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020; 102(3):521-531. PMC: 7934085. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.383. View