» Articles » PMID: 39934588

The Changing Needs of Peer Support Among Gay Men Living with HIV in Australia: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis

Overview
Journal Arch Sex Behav
Date 2025 Feb 11
PMID 39934588
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite a significant decline in HIV transmission in Australia, many people living with HIV continue to face stigma and discrimination. For gay men, historically at high risk for HIV, peer support programs are essential to improve psychosocial outcomes. Peer support is known to reduce stigma demonstrably, improve well-being, increase medication adherence, and connect participants to broader HIV services. While peer support is known to be important within the HIV care continuum, there is little research on factors associated with engagement with peer support and no Australian study has examined determinants of involvement. This study focused on Australian gay men living with HIV for at least five years to understand the factors impacting engagement, retention, and attrition. Twenty participants with 5-36 years of lived experience participated in semi-structured interviews. Reflexive thematic analysis revealed four key themes: (1) shared experiences, (2) confidentiality and trust, (3) changing needs with aging, and (4) inclusion and collaboration. The themes highlight the importance of fostering connection, trust, program adaptability, and agency. Barriers to engagement included problems with online support access due to cost, limited technological proficiency, and concerns about program relevance for aging men who have extensive HIV lived experience. The findings underscore the need for consistent funding to support well-defined program scopes that cater to diverse and changing needs. Such enhanced program support is crucial to address the specific requirements of men with long-term experience of living with HIV as they age through the HIV care continuum.

References
1.
Berg R, Page S, Ogard-Repal A . The effectiveness of peer-support for people living with HIV: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021; 16(6):e0252623. PMC: 8211296. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252623. View

2.
Bor J, Fischer C, Modi M, Richman B, Kinker C, King R . Changing Knowledge and Attitudes Towards HIV Treatment-as-Prevention and "Undetectable = Untransmittable": A Systematic Review. AIDS Behav. 2021; 25(12):4209-4224. PMC: 8147591. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-021-03296-8. View

3.
Brashers D, Basinger E, Rintamaki L, Caughlin J, Para M . Taking Control: The Efficacy and Durability of a Peer-Led Uncertainty Management Intervention for People Recently Diagnosed With HIV. Health Commun. 2016; 32(1):11-21. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2015.1089469. View

4.
Broady T, Cama E, Brener L, Hopwood M, de Wit J, Treloar C . Responding to a national policy need: development of a stigma indicator for bloodborne viruses and sexually transmissible infections. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2018; 42(6):513-515. DOI: 10.1111/1753-6405.12809. View

5.
Bulsara S, Wainberg M, Audet C, Newton-John T . Retention in HIV Care in Australia: The Perspectives of Clinicians and Clients, and the Impact of Medical and Psychosocial Comorbidity. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2019; 33(10):415-424. DOI: 10.1089/apc.2019.0094. View