» Articles » PMID: 39929908

Analyzing the Influence of Manufactured Sand and Fly Ash on Concrete Strength Through Experimental and Machine Learning Methods

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Date 2025 Feb 10
PMID 39929908
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

River sand supplies are decreasing due to overexploitation and illicit sand mining. One ton of Portland cement production (the main binder in concrete) emits about one ton of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Thus, this study replaced conventional cement and river sand (R sand) with recycled waste materials (fly ash and manufactured sand (M sand)). The concrete mix proportions were designed using M40 grade, and the Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and R sand were replaced with 0-85 wt% of fly ash and 0-100 wt% of M sand. The concrete samples were tested for compressive strength after 3-90 days of curing. Furthermore, machine learning (ML) techniques were engaged to predict the compressive strength of the concrete samples using Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR). Besides, the concrete samples containing fly ash, M sand, and R sand were characterized for microstructures and elemental compositions using SEM-EDS. The results revealed improved concrete compressive strength by incorporating fly ash and M sand. After 28 days of curing, OPC and R sand were partially replaced with 25 and 50 wt% of fly ash and M sand attained the designed strength of M 40 grade concrete. XGBoost model yielded the most accurate performance metrics for forecasting the compressive strength in training and testing phases with R values equal to 0.9999 and 0.9964, respectively, compared to LSTM, SVM, and GPR. Thus, the XGBoost approach can be a viable technique for forecasting the strength of concrete incorporating fly ash and M sand. SEM-EDS analyses revealed compact formations with high calcium and silicon counts. Thus, the XGBoost approach can be a viable technique for forecasting the strength of concrete incorporating fly ash and M sand.

References
1.
Ziolkowski P, Niedostatkiewicz M . Machine Learning Techniques in Concrete Mix Design. Materials (Basel). 2019; 12(8). PMC: 6515295. DOI: 10.3390/ma12081256. View

2.
Ibraheem M, Butt F, Waqas R, Hussain K, Tufail R, Ahmad N . Mechanical and Microstructural Characterization of Quarry Rock Dust Incorporated Steel Fiber Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete and Residual Properties after Exposure to Elevated Temperatures. Materials (Basel). 2021; 14(22). PMC: 8624835. DOI: 10.3390/ma14226890. View

3.
Isleem H, Zewudie B, Bahrami A, Kumar R, Xingchong W, Samui P . Parametric investigation of rectangular CFRP-confined concrete columns reinforced by inner elliptical steel tubes using finite element and machine learning models. Heliyon. 2024; 10(2):e23666. PMC: 11639692. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23666. View

4.
Bai R, Zhang J, Yan C, Liu S, Wang X, Yang Z . Calcium hydroxide content and hydration degree of cement in cementitious composites containing calcium silicate slag. Chemosphere. 2021; 280:130918. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130918. View

5.
Khan K, Iqbal M, Biswas R, Amin M, Ali S, Gudainiyan J . A Hybrid SVR-Based Prediction Model for the Interfacial Bond Strength of Externally Bonded FRP Laminates on Grooves with Concrete Prisms. Polymers (Basel). 2022; 14(15). PMC: 9370787. DOI: 10.3390/polym14153097. View