» Articles » PMID: 39929503

Clinicians' Experience with Infographic Summaries from the BMJ Rapid Recommendations: a Qualitative User-testing Study Among Residents and Interns at a Large Teaching Hospital in Switzerland

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Date 2025 Feb 10
PMID 39929503
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Clinicians need trustworthy clinical practice guidelines to succeed with evidence-based diagnosis and treatment at the bedside. The BMJ Rapid Recommendations explore innovative ways to enhance dissemination and uptake, including multilayered interactive infographics linked to a digitally structured authoring and publication platform (the MAGICapp). We aimed to assess user experiences of physicians in training in various specialties when they interact with these infographics.

Design: We conducted a qualitative user-testing study to assess user experience of a convenience sample of physicians in training. User testing was carried out through guided think-aloud sessions. We assessed six facets of user experience using a revised version of Morville's framework: usefulness, understandability, usability, credibility, desirability and identification.

Setting: Setting include Geneva's University Hospital, a large teaching hospital in Switzerland.

Participants: Participants include a convenience sample of residents and interns without restriction regarding medical field or division of care.

Results: Most users reported a positive experience. The infographics were understandable and useful to rapidly grasp the key elements of the recommendation, its rationale and supporting evidence, in a credible way. Some users felt intimidated by numbers or the amount of information, although they perceived there could be a learning curve while using generic formats. Plain language summaries helped complement the visuals but could be further highlighted. Despite their generally positive experience, several users had limited understanding of key GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) domains of the quality of evidence and remained uncertain by the implication of weak or conditional recommendations.

Conclusion: Our study allowed to identify several aspects of guideline formats that improve their understandability and usefulness. Guideline organisations can use our findings to adapt their presentation format to enhance their dissemination and uptake in clinical practice. Avenues for research include the interplay between infographics and the digital authoring platform, multiple comparisons and living guidelines.

References
1.
Santesso N, Wiercioch W, Barbara A, Dietl H, Schunemann H . Focus groups and interviews with the public led to the development of a template for a GRADE Plain Language Recommendation (PLR). J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 141:18-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.09.018. View

2.
Alexander P, Li S, Gionfriddo M, Stoltzfus R, Neumann I, Brito J . Senior GRADE methodologists encounter challenges as part of WHO guideline development panels: an inductive content analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015; 70:123-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.09.003. View

3.
Van Bostraeten P, Aertgeerts B, Bekkering G, Delvaux N, Dijckmans C, Ostyn E . Infographic summaries for clinical practice guidelines: results from user testing of the BMJ Rapid Recommendations in primary care. BMJ Open. 2023; 13(11):e071847. PMC: 10649784. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071847. View

4.
Bastian H, Glasziou P, Chalmers I . Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up?. PLoS Med. 2010; 7(9):e1000326. PMC: 2943439. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000326. View

5.
Tikkinen K, Dahm P, Lytvyn L, Heen A, Vernooij R, Siemieniuk R . Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: a clinical practice guideline. BMJ. 2018; 362:k3581. PMC: 6283372. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k3581. View