The Reliability and Validity of the Swedish Translation of the Vertigo Symptom Scale - Short Form in a Cohort with Acute Vestibular Syndrome

Overview

Journal Ann Med

Publisher Informa Healthcare

Date 2025 Feb 10

PMID 39928092

Authors

Solmaz Surano

Erik Faergemann

Gabriel Granasen

Jonatan Salzer

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The Vertigo Symptom Scale - short form (VSS-SF) is commonly used to measure dizziness and vertigo over the past month. This study aimed to (1) adapt the VSS-SF for the Swedish population and assess its psychometric properties, and (2) develop a modified version for measuring symptoms in the acute phase of acute vestibular syndrome (AVS).

Methods: The VSS-SF was translated into Swedish and adapted cross-culturally. Its psychometric properties were evaluated in 86 AVS patients, both in the acute stage (1-7 days from symptom onset) with a modified acute version, and after six weeks of vestibular rehabilitation using the standard VSS-SF. Factor structure, convergent and discriminant validity, and internal consistency were analyzed. Test-retest reliability was assessed at six weeks. Participants were also evaluated with the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and balance tests. Controls included 54 healthy participants.

Results: Exploratory factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure for both versions, corresponding to vertigo-balance (VSS-V) and autonomic-anxiety (VSS-A) subscales. Both versions demonstrated strong factor structures with adequate loadings. Internal consistency was high for the standard version (Cronbach's alpha 0.76 to 0.87) and for the total and VSS-V subscale of the acute version (0.82 and 0.85, respectively), but poor for the acute VSS-A subscale (0.50). Convergent validity was supported by Spearman's rank correlations. The discriminative ability was excellent for the acute VSS-SF and VSS-V (AUC 0.98 and 0.99), and acceptable for VSS-A (AUC 0.77). After six weeks, discriminative ability decreased but remained above 0.5. Test-retest reliability at six weeks was excellent for all scales (ICC 0.94, 0.93, and 0.93 for VSS-SF, VSS-V, and VSS-A).

Conclusions: The VSS-SF was successfully adapted for the Swedish population, including an acute version for early dizziness assessment. Both versions confirmed a robust two-factor structure, with the acute version showing excellent early discriminative ability, particularly for the vertigo-balance dimension. However, the autonomic-anxiety subscale showed weaker psychometric properties, suggesting limited suitability for AVS patients. The adapted scales show promise for clinical use in diagnosing and evaluating dizziness and vertigo in the Swedish population.

Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT05056324, September 24, 2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05056324.

References

Kim H . Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restor Dent Endod. 2013; 38(1):52-4. PMC: 3591587. DOI: 10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52. View

Gloor-Juzi T, Kurre A, Straumann D, de Bruin E . Translation and validation of the vertigo symptom scale into German: A cultural adaption to a wider German-speaking population. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2012; 12:7. PMC: 3441555. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6815-12-7. View

Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz M . Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(24):3186-91. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014. View

Murdin L, Schilder A . Epidemiology of balance symptoms and disorders in the community: a systematic review. Otol Neurotol. 2014; 36(3):387-92. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000691. View

Yardley L, Masson E, Verschuur C, Haacke N, Luxon L . Symptoms, anxiety and handicap in dizzy patients: development of the vertigo symptom scale. J Psychosom Res. 1992; 36(8):731-41. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3999(92)90131-k. View

Geraghty A, Essery R, Kirby S, Stuart B, Turner D, Little P . Internet-Based Vestibular Rehabilitation for Older Adults With Chronic Dizziness: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Primary Care. Ann Fam Med. 2017; 15(3):209-216. PMC: 5422081. DOI: 10.1370/afm.2070. View

Bisdorff A, von Brevern M, Lempert T, Newman-Toker D . Classification of vestibular symptoms: towards an international classification of vestibular disorders. J Vestib Res. 2009; 19(1-2):1-13. DOI: 10.3233/VES-2009-0343. View

MENDEL B, Bergenius J, Langius A . Dizziness symptom severity and impact on daily living as perceived by patients suffering from peripheral vestibular disorder. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1999; 24(4):286-93. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.1999.00261.x. View

Zmnako S, Chalabi Y . Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Vertigo symptom scale-short form in the central Kurdish dialect. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019; 17(1):125. PMC: 6637568. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-019-1168-z. View

10.

Garrido L, Abad F, Ponsoda V . A new look at Horn's parallel analysis with ordinal variables. Psychol Methods. 2012; 18(4):454-74. DOI: 10.1037/a0030005. View

11.

Yardley L, Donovan-Hall M, Smith H, Walsh B, Mullee M, Bronstein A . Effectiveness of primary care-based vestibular rehabilitation for chronic dizziness. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 141(8):598-605. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-8-200410190-00007. View

12.

Edlow J, Newman-Toker D . Medical and Nonstroke Neurologic Causes of Acute, Continuous Vestibular Symptoms. Neurol Clin. 2015; 33(3):699-716, xi. PMC: 9116936. DOI: 10.1016/j.ncl.2015.04.002. View

13.

Mokkink L, Terwee C, Patrick D, Alonso J, Stratford P, Knol D . The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010; 19(4):539-49. PMC: 2852520. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8. View

14.

Yardley L, Medina S, Jurado C, Morales T, Martinez R, Villegas H . Relationship between physical and psychosocial dysfunction in Mexican patients with vertigo: a cross-cultural validation of the vertigo symptom scale. J Psychosom Res. 1999; 46(1):63-74. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3999(98)00056-7. View

15.

Kondo M, Kiyomizu K, Goto F, Kitahara T, Imai T, Hashimoto M . Analysis of vestibular-balance symptoms according to symptom duration: dimensionality of the Vertigo Symptom Scale-short form. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015; 13:4. PMC: 4311503. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-015-0207-7. View

16.

McHorney C, TARLOV A . Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?. Qual Life Res. 1995; 4(4):293-307. DOI: 10.1007/BF01593882. View

17.

Jacobson G, Newman C . The development of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990; 116(4):424-7. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1990.01870040046011. View

18.

Koo T, Li M . A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15(2):155-63. PMC: 4913118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. View

19.

Yardley L, Burgneay J, Andersson G, Owen N, Nazareth I, Luxon L . Feasibility and effectiveness of providing vestibular rehabilitation for dizzy patients in the community. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1998; 23(5):442-8. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.1998.00179.x. View

20.

Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A . Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005; 8(2):94-104. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x. View