» Articles » PMID: 39926698

Comparative Effectiveness of Traditional East Asian Medicine Treatments for Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Integr Med Res
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2025 Feb 10
PMID 39926698
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs) cause pain and functional restrictions in the temporomandibular joint that interfere with daily activities. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and safety of various traditional East Asian medicine treatments, including acupuncture, electroacupuncture, moxibustion, and herbal medicine, in the management of TMD.

Methods: We included searches of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, OASIS, KISS, RISS, KMbase, KCI, CNKI, and CiNii from inception to November 12, 2023, for randomized controlled trials of traditional East Asian medicine treatments in patients with TMD. A network meta-analysis was performed using frequentist methods, and the Confidence In Network Meta-Analysis methodology were employed to assess evidence quality.

Results: Forty-five studies with 2,211 participants were finally included. Acupotomy (Mean difference (MD) -5.07, 95 % Confidence interval (CI) -7.37 to -2.78) and acupuncture (MD -1.18, 95 % CI -2.28 to -0.09) showed statistically significant superiority in reducing pain intensity compared to sham treatment. According to the SUCRA rankings, acupotomy was considered the most effective treatment, followed by electroacupuncture, acupuncture, manipulation, laser therapy and occlusal splint. A total of 12 studies reported incidence of adverse events, and none were serious adverse events.

Conclusion: Acupotomy and acupuncture could be more beneficial than sham treatment in pain relief and might be a better option than occlusal splint. However, future rigorous, well-designed trials are needed to draw clear conclusions.

Protocol Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42023467340).

References
1.
Calixtre L, Oliveira A, Alburquerque-Sendin F, Armijo-Olivo S . What is the minimal important difference of pain intensity, mandibular function, and headache impact in patients with temporomandibular disorders? Clinical significance analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020; 46:102108. DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102108. View

2.
Shousha T, Alayat M, Moustafa I . Effects of low-level laser therapy versus soft occlusive splints on mouth opening and surface electromyography in females with temporomandibular dysfunction: A randomized-controlled study. PLoS One. 2021; 16(10):e0258063. PMC: 8486092. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258063. View

3.
Maia M, Ribeiro M, Maia L, Stuginski-Barbosa J, Costa Y, Porporatti A . Evaluation of low-level laser therapy effectiveness on the pain and masticatory performance of patients with myofascial pain. Lasers Med Sci. 2012; 29(1):29-35. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-012-1228-7. View

4.
de Salles-Neto F, Paula J, Romero J, Almeida-Leite C . Acupuncture for pain, mandibular function and oral health-related quality of life in patients with masticatory myofascial pain: A randomised controlled trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2020; 47(10):1193-1201. DOI: 10.1111/joor.13055. View

5.
Kalamir A, Graham P, Vitiello A, Bonello R, Pollard H . Intra-oral myofascial therapy versus education and self-care in the treatment of chronic, myogenous temporomandibular disorder: a randomised, clinical trial. Chiropr Man Therap. 2013; 21:17. PMC: 3706243. DOI: 10.1186/2045-709X-21-17. View