» Articles » PMID: 39925536

A Review of Judgments of Learning and Executive Functions in Spaced Learning: The Enemy of Spacing?

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2025 Feb 10
PMID 39925536
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The benefit of the spacing effect is inherently hindered by perception bias in making judgments of learning (JOLs), but more insights might be found in the context of executive functions (EF), where it correlates with metacognitive strategies and cognitive loads. Thus, this article attempts to address the dilemma of the spacing effect by synthesizing both existing JOL and EF perspectives. This paper yields various mechanisms related to memory performance in spaced learning: delayed JOLs, JOL reactivity, overt retrieval, inhibition control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility. All of these factors associate with the theory of mind, an important yet understudied social-cognitive skill in spaced learning which could shift our ways of thinking about spacing.

References
1.
Zhao W, Li B, Shanks D, Zhao W, Zheng J, Hu X . When judging what you know changes what you really know: Soliciting metamemory judgments reactively enhances children's learning. Child Dev. 2021; 93(2):405-417. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.13689. View

2.
Double K, Birney D, Walker S . A meta-analysis and systematic review of reactivity to judgements of learning. Memory. 2017; 26(6):741-750. DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1404111. View

3.
Diamond A . Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2012; 64:135-68. PMC: 4084861. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750. View

4.
Xu J, Metcalfe J . Studying in the region of proximal learning reduces mind wandering. Mem Cognit. 2016; 44(5):681-95. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-016-0589-8. View

5.
Dougherty M, Robey A, Buttaccio D . Do metacognitive judgments alter memory performance beyond the benefits of retrieval practice? A comment on and replication attempt of Dougherty, Scheck, Nelson, and Narens (2005). Mem Cognit. 2018; 46(4):558-565. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-018-0791-y. View