Drug Insurance and Psoriasis Severity: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Overview
Affiliations
Prescription drug insurance in Canada is constituted of a patchwork of public and private insurance plans. The type of drug insurance may have a negative impact on access to treatment for patients covered by public plans compared with private plans. In patients with psoriasis treated with advanced therapy in public vs private drug insurance groups, we compared: (1) psoriasis severity scores when an advanced therapy was prescribed, (2) psoriasis severity scores at follow-up, (3) treatment response, and (4) delay between prescription and first dose of advanced therapy. This unicentric, retrospective cohort study included patients suffering from psoriasis treated by advanced therapy, dermatologist-prescribed between September 2015 and August 2019, in a tertiary academic care center in Québec City, Canada. Data were collected from medical records. Patients treated with an advanced therapy for psoriasis covered under the provincial public drug insurance plan (n = 78) and under a private drug plan (n = 93) did not differ regarding the studied outcomes. Patients' characteristics differed between groups. Patients in the public group were older ( < .0001), more socioeconomically deprived ( < .05), and more likely to benefit from compassion from the industry to access a prescribed medication free of charge ( < .0001) compared with patients from the privately insured group. The high prevalence of compassionate programs from the industry in the public insurance group (42% vs 14%), and the high prevalence of psoriasis on difficult-to-treat areas (face, genitalia, and/or palmoplantar areas) in our cohort (85.4%) may mask differences in access to advanced therapy between the two groups. Prescribers of advanced therapy can be reassured, as we found no inequality in access or care based on patients' drug insurance coverage.