» Articles » PMID: 39920596

The Patient Perspective on Transanal Irrigation Treatment for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome After Rectal Cancer Surgery - a Qualitative and Quantitative Study

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to explore long-term experiences of transanal irrigation (TAI) in patients with major low anterior resection syndrome (LARS).

Methods: The study included a qualitative and quantitative analysis of patients who developed major LARS after rectal cancer surgery between 2016 and 2019 and have undergone treatment with TAI. The patients received questionnaires. Mean scores were calculated with time-to-deterioration. Individual semi-structured interviews were performed and analyzed, according to Graneheim and Lundman with patients who performed TAI regularly for more than one year.

Results: In total 28 out of 39 patients responded to the questionnaires and 16 patients participated in the interviews. At mean 6-years follow-up, a 9.4 points difference in mean LARS score was obtained, (21.2 vs. 30.7) indicating less LARS symptoms in favor of the TAI treatment. Patients in the TAI group used less loperamide compared to the control group (36% vs. 79%). The use of bulky agents was similar. The interview text rendered into three main categories: regaining control in everyday life, need for structure and planning and becoming familiar with the procedure.

Conclusions: Treatment with TAI showed the potential to improve the quality of life of patients with major LARS. The improvements in their general well-being were valued over adjustments and time spent on TAI.

Implications For Cancer Survivors: Bowel dysfunction remains after 6-years with lower LARS scores favoring the TAI treatment. In the absence of a definitive treatment, survivors of rectal cancer coping with LARS have shown appreciation of the TAI treatment.

References
1.
Chen T, Wiltink L, Nout R, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Laurberg S, Marijnen C . Bowel function 14 years after preoperative short-course radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2015; 14(2):106-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2014.12.007. View

2.
Christensen P, Krogh K, Buntzen S, Payandeh F, Laurberg S . Long-term outcome and safety of transanal irrigation for constipation and fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009; 52(2):286-92. DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181979341. View

3.
Maalouf M, Robitaille S, Penta R, Pook M, Liberman A, Fiore Jr J . Understanding the Impact of Bowel Dysfunction on Quality of Life After Rectal Cancer Surgery From the Patient's Perspective. Dis Colon Rectum. 2023; 66(8):1067-1075. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002621. View

4.
Rosen H, Kneist W, Furst A, Kramer G, Hebenstreit J, Schiemer J . Randomized clinical trial of prophylactic transanal irrigation supportive therapy to prevent symptoms of low anterior resection syndrome after rectal resection. BJS Open. 2019; 3(4):461-465. PMC: 6677104. DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50160. View

5.
Tsui H, Huang X . Experiences of Losing Bowel Control After Lower Anterior Resection With Sphincter Saving Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Qualitative Study. Cancer Nurs. 2021; 45(6):E890-E896. DOI: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000001036. View