» Articles » PMID: 39920319

Anatomy of the Diaphragmatic Crura and Other Paraspinal Structures Relevant to En-bloc Spondylectomy for Lumbar Spine Tumours

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Date 2025 Feb 7
PMID 39920319
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: En-bloc spondylectomy in the lumbar spine is a challenging procedure mainly due to a complex prevertebral anatomy. The aim of our study is to describe the anatomy of the diaphragmatic crura and surrounding vascular and neural structures which may be iatrogenically injured during the surgical resection.

Materials And Methods: Ten embalmed specimens were meticulously dissected. Widths of the diaphragmatic crura, abdominal aorta, cisterna chyli, thoracic duct, sympathetic trunks, and inferior vena cava as well as their distances from the midline were measured at nine levels (L1 to L4 vertebra and adjacent intervertebral discs).

Results: The right crus was attached to the L2-L4 vertebral bodies and L2/3 intervertebral disc, while the left crus inserted onto L1-L3 vertebrae. The thoracic duct arose commonly at the level of L2 vertebra and overlaid the right crus at the L3 vertebra and L2/3-disc levels. The cisterna chyli was present in 70% of specimens and overlapped with the left crus at the same levels. Both sympathetic trunks emerged underneath the crura at the L1/2 discs or L1 vertebra level. The aorta overlapped with the crura at all levels.

Conclusion: The L3 level appears to be the riskiest for spondylectomy due to the overlap of both diaphragmatic crura with the thoracic duct and cisterna chyli, respectively. Spondylectomy at the L2 level also brings the risk of lymphatic structures injury while injury to the left sympathetic trunk may be the main issue at the L1 level.

References
1.
Boriani S . resection in the spine: a procedure of surgical oncology. J Spine Surg. 2018; 4(3):668-676. PMC: 6261759. DOI: 10.21037/jss.2018.09.02. View

2.
Tomita K, Kawahara N, Baba H, Tsuchiya H, Fujita T, Toribatake Y . Total en bloc spondylectomy. A new surgical technique for primary malignant vertebral tumors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997; 22(3):324-33. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199702010-00018. View

3.
Kawahara N, Tomita K, Murakami H, Demura S . Total en bloc spondylectomy for spinal tumors: surgical techniques and related basic background. Orthop Clin North Am. 2008; 40(1):47-63, vi. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2008.09.004. View

4.
Hsieh P, Li K, Sciubba D, Suk I, Wolinsky J, Ziya L Gokaslan . Posterior-only approach for total en bloc spondylectomy for malignant primary spinal neoplasms: anatomic considerations and operative nuances. Neurosurgery. 2009; 65(6 Suppl):173-81. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000345630.47344.17. View

5.
Missenard G, Bouthors C, Fadel E, Court C . Surgical strategies for primary malignant tumors of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019; 106(1S):S53-S62. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.05.028. View