» Articles » PMID: 39913497

Immediate and Short-term Effects of Neurodynamic Techniques on Hamstring Flexibility: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2025 Feb 6
PMID 39913497
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Good hamstring flexibility(HF) is crucial for sports performance and health, with injuries having an economic impact on healthcare and sports teams. Therefore, our objectives were to estimate the effect of neurodynamic techniques on HF and to compare the effect of these techniques with static stretching.

Methods: We systematically searched the Cochrane, MEDLINE(via PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science and Sportdiscus databases for RCTs comparing neurodynamic interventions with control intervention or with static stretching exercises for HF in adults with limited HF. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis with subgroup analyses according to the type of comparison group(control group or static stretching exercises) and total number of sessions. Furthermore, to reflect the variation in genuine therapy effects in different scenarios, including future patients, we calculated a 95% prediction interval(prI).

Results: Thirteen trials were included, involving 624 participants. Pooled results showed a significant improvement in HF for immediate (SMD = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.59) and short-term effects (SMD = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.52). Subgroup analyses by type of comparison group showed that these techniques are more effective than the control group in the immediate and short term and than static stretching in the short term. Analyses by total sessions showed a significant increase in HF with a treatment of 1, 3, 10 and 12 sessions.

Conclusion: Neurodynamic techniques improve HF immediately and in the short term. Subgroup analyses by type of comparison group showed that these techniques are more effective than static stretching in the short term.

References
1.
Rudisill S, Varady N, Kucharik M, Eberlin C, Martin S . Evidence-Based Hamstring Injury Prevention and Risk Factor Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Am J Sports Med. 2022; 51(7):1927-1942. DOI: 10.1177/03635465221083998. View

2.
Muanjai P, Jones D, Mickevicius M, Satkunskiene D, Snieckus A, Skurvydas A . The acute benefits and risks of passive stretching to the point of pain. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017; 117(6):1217-1226. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-017-3608-y. View

3.
Alshami A, Alghamdi M, Abdelsalam M . Effect of Neural Mobilization Exercises in Patients With Low Back-Related Leg Pain With Peripheral Nerve Sensitization: A Prospective, Controlled Trial. J Chiropr Med. 2022; 20(2):59-69. PMC: 8703155. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2021.07.001. View

4.
Castellote-Caballero Y, Valenza M, Martin-Martin L, Cabrera-Martos I, Puentedura E, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C . Effects of a neurodynamic sliding technique on hamstring flexibility in healthy male soccer players. A pilot study. Phys Ther Sport. 2012; 14(3):156-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2012.07.004. View

5.
Sterne J, Egger M, Smith G . Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. BMJ. 2001; 323(7304):101-5. PMC: 1120714. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7304.101. View