Medical Students and ChatGPT: Analyzing Attitudes, Practices, and Academic Perceptions

Overview

Journal BMC Med Educ

Publisher Biomed Central

Date 2025 Feb 5

PMID 39910593

Authors

Ahmed Samir Abdelhafiz

Maysa I Farghly

Eman Anwar Sultan

Moaz Elsayed Abouelmagd

Youssef Ashmawy

Eman Hany Elsebaie

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: ChatGPT, a chatbot launched by OpenAI in November 2022, has generated both excitement and concern within the healthcare education, research, and practice communities. This study aimed to explore the knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and practices of undergraduate medical students regarding the use of ChatGPT and similar chatbots in their academic work.

Methods: An anonymous, structured questionnaire was developed using Google Forms and administered to medical students as part of a cross-sectional study. The survey targeted undergraduate medical students from four governorates in Egypt. The questionnaire link was distributed through social media platforms, including Facebook and WhatsApp. The survey comprised four sections: socio-demographic characteristics, perceptions, attitudes, and practices.

Results: The survey achieved a response rate of 96%, with 614 out of 640 approached students participating. Prior to the study, most respondents (78.5%) had personal experience using it. Overall, respondents demonstrated positive perceptions, attitudes, and practices toward ChatGPT, with mean scores exceeding 3 for all three variables: 3.99 ± 0.60 for perceptions, 3.01 ± 0.46 for attitudes, and 3.55 ± 0.55 for practices. In general, the students exhibited a high degree of trust in the model, with approximately half trusting the accuracy and reliability of the information provided by ChatGPT. However, more than two-thirds expressed apprehension about its potential misuse in medical education, and around 60% were concerned about the accuracy of information ChatGPT might generate on complex medical topics.

Conclusions: Medical students show strong interest and trust in using ChatGPT and similar chatbots for academic purposes but have concerns about the reliability of the information and potential misuse in medical education. The use of AI tools should follow ethical guidelines set by academic institutions, with regular updates to keep pace with technological progress. Future research should focus on the impact of AI on education and personal development, especially among young people.

References

Subramani M, Jaleel I, Mohan S . Evaluating the performance of ChatGPT in medical physiology university examination of phase I MBBS. Adv Physiol Educ. 2023; 47(2):270-271. DOI: 10.1152/advan.00036.2023. View

Macdonald C, Adeloye D, Sheikh A, Rudan I . Can ChatGPT draft a research article? An example of population-level vaccine effectiveness analysis. J Glob Health. 2023; 13:01003. PMC: 9936200. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.13.01003. View

Ghorashi N, Ismail A, Ghosh P, Sidawy A, Javan R . AI-Powered Chatbots in Medical Education: Potential Applications and Implications. Cureus. 2023; 15(8):e43271. PMC: 10492519. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43271. View

Baglivo F, De Angelis L, Casigliani V, Arzilli G, Privitera G, Rizzo C . Exploring the Possible Use of AI Chatbots in Public Health Education: Feasibility Study. JMIR Med Educ. 2023; 9:e51421. PMC: 10652189. DOI: 10.2196/51421. View

Sallam M, Salim N, Barakat M, Al-Tammemi A . ChatGPT applications in medical, dental, pharmacy, and public health education: A descriptive study highlighting the advantages and limitations. Narra J. 2024; 3(1):e103. PMC: 10914078. DOI: 10.52225/narra.v3i1.103. View

Stokel-Walker C, Van Noorden R . What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science. Nature. 2023; 614(7947):214-216. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-023-00340-6. View

Goddard K, Roudsari A, Wyatt J . Automation bias: a systematic review of frequency, effect mediators, and mitigators. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011; 19(1):121-7. PMC: 3240751. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000089. View

Huang S, Lai X, Ke L, Li Y, Wang H, Zhao X . AI Technology panic-is AI Dependence Bad for Mental Health? A Cross-Lagged Panel Model and the Mediating Roles of Motivations for AI Use Among Adolescents. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024; 17:1087-1102. PMC: 10944174. DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S440889. View

Li X, Xie S, Ye Z, Ma S, Yu G . Investigating Patients' Continuance Intention Toward Conversational Agents in Outpatient Departments: Cross-sectional Field Survey. J Med Internet Res. 2022; 24(11):e40681. PMC: 9679947. DOI: 10.2196/40681. View

10.

Gilson A, Safranek C, Huang T, Socrates V, Chi L, Taylor R . How Does ChatGPT Perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE)? The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge Assessment. JMIR Med Educ. 2023; 9:e45312. PMC: 9947764. DOI: 10.2196/45312. View

11.

Sallam M . ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns. Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(6). PMC: 10048148. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11060887. View

12.

Abdelhafiz A, Ali A, Maaly A, Ziady H, Sultan E, Mahgoub M . Knowledge, Perceptions and Attitude of Researchers Towards Using ChatGPT in Research. J Med Syst. 2024; 48(1):26. PMC: 10899415. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-024-02044-4. View

13.

McLean M, Gibbs T . Learner-centred medical education: Improved learning or increased stress?. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2009; 22(3):287. View

14.

van Dis E, Bollen J, Zuidema W, van Rooij R, Bockting C . ChatGPT: five priorities for research. Nature. 2023; 614(7947):224-226. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7. View

15.

. Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use. Nature. 2023; 613(7945):612. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-023-00191-1. View

16.

Eysenbach G . Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res. 2004; 6(3):e34. PMC: 1550605. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34. View

17.

Li R, Kumar A, Chen J . How Chatbots and Large Language Model Artificial Intelligence Systems Will Reshape Modern Medicine: Fountain of Creativity or Pandora's Box?. JAMA Intern Med. 2023; 183(6):596-597. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1835. View

18.

Lee H . The rise of ChatGPT: Exploring its potential in medical education. Anat Sci Educ. 2023; 17(5):926-931. DOI: 10.1002/ase.2270. View

19.

Stokel-Walker C . AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays - should professors worry?. Nature. 2022; . DOI: 10.1038/d41586-022-04397-7. View

20.

Harrer S . Attention is not all you need: the complicated case of ethically using large language models in healthcare and medicine. EBioMedicine. 2023; 90:104512. PMC: 10025985. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104512. View