» Articles » PMID: 39907906

Long-term Local Control and Cosmesis of Perioperative Interstitial Brachytherapy for Partial Breast Irradiation Following Breast-conserving Surgery

Overview
Journal Breast Cancer
Date 2025 Feb 5
PMID 39907906
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB) is an established technique of partial breast irradiation (PBI). However, postoperative catheter implant is an invasive, inconvenient, and skillful procedure. In this study, local control and cosmesis of perioperative interstitial brachytherapy (PIB) by intraoperative catheter implant were evaluated by comparing with those of whole breast irradiation (WBI) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS).

Methods: Between October 2007 and August 2019, consequent patients who underwent either PIB or WBI following BCS were included. In general, additional indications for PIB to WBI included age ≥ 40 years, tumor ≤ 3 cm, and pN0 or pNmi. WBI was initiated with a total dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions, whereas PBI was delivered immediately following BCS at 32 Gy in eight fractions. Local recurrence (LR) was the primary endpoint, and subjective and objective cosmetic outcomes at 5 years using the Harvard Cosmesis Scale and BCCT.core software, respectively, were the secondary endpoints.

Results: During the 10-year follow-up, the crude rate of LR was 3.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.3-5.4) in 577 patients receiving PIB and 3.3% (95% CI 1.1-5.6) in 241 patients receiving WBI (P = 0.73). The 5- and 10-year LR-free survival rates in the PBI and WBI cohorts were 97.9% versus 97.9% and 95.4% versus 96.8%, respectively (P = 0.64). Multivariate analysis selected age < 50 years as an independent risk factor for LR. Excellent or good cosmesis in the PBI and WBI cohorts assessed by subjective and objective measures was 89.5% versus 84.5% (P = 0.26) and 83.7% versus 68.1% (P < 0.005), respectively.

Conclusions: Although this study was based on a retrospective chart review in a single institution, the largest series of data with a long follow-up suggested that acceptable local tumor control and cosmesis were achieved following PIB compared with WBI.

References
1.
Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A . Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347(16):1227-32. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa020989. View

2.
Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese R, Deutsch M, Fisher E . Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347(16):1233-41. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa022152. View

3.
Taylor C, Correa C, Duane F, Aznar M, Anderson S, Bergh J . Estimating the Risks of Breast Cancer Radiotherapy: Evidence From Modern Radiation Doses to the Lungs and Heart and From Previous Randomized Trials. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35(15):1641-1649. PMC: 5548226. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.72.0722. View

4.
Meattini I, Guenzi M, Fozza A, Vidali C, Rovea P, Meacci F . Overview on cardiac, pulmonary and cutaneous toxicity in patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2016; 24(1):52-62. DOI: 10.1007/s12282-016-0694-3. View

5.
Dragun A, Huang B, Tucker T, Spanos W . Disparities in the application of adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for early stage breast cancer: impact on overall survival. Cancer. 2011; 117(12):2590-8. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25821. View