» Articles » PMID: 39907774

Individual Variability in Lactate Response to Cycling Prescribed Using Physiological Thresholds and Peak Work Rate: a Crossover Within-participant Repeated Measures Study

Overview
Date 2025 Feb 5
PMID 39907774
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: (1) To determine if the blood lactate concentration ([BLa]) response is a repeatable individual trait, and (2) To examine whether threshold-based prescription (THR) reduces interindividual variability in [BLa] response compared to traditional (maximally anchored) exercise prescription (TRAD).

Method: A crossover within-participant repeated measures design was used to assess [BLa] during the TRAD and THR exercise in 17 participants (9 M/8F). Participants initially undertook an incremental test to exhaustion to determine peak work rate (WRpeak), a lactate threshold (LT) test and a critical power (CP) test. All baseline tests were repeated twice. Participants then completed 6 15-min bouts of continuous cycling at 65%WRpeak (TRAD; 3 bouts) and 80% of the difference (Δ80) between LT and CP (THR; 3 bouts). [BLa] response was measured at 10 and 15 min of exercise.

Results: Across individuals, there was a wide range in [BLa] response, but within individual responses were repeatable. [BLa] ranges and mean individual 90% confidence interval width (CI) were as follows: TRAD@10 min = 2.1-9.7 mmol, CI = 0.5 mmol, THR@10 min = 3.4-9.3 mmol, CI = 0.6 mmol, TRAD@15 min = 2.2-9.9 mmol, CI = 0.6 mmol, THR@15 min = 3.6-12.3 mmol, CI = 0.7 mmol. Levene's tests revealed no significant differences in the variability of [BLa] response between TRAD and THR at 10 min (F = 0.523, p = 0.475) or 15 min (F = 0.351, p = 0.558) of exercise.

Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that true interindividual variability in the [BLa] response to exercise exists, but failed to confirm that variability in [BLa] response is reduced with the use of THR.

References
1.
Anselmi F, Cavigli L, Pagliaro A, Valente S, Valentini F, Cameli M . The importance of ventilatory thresholds to define aerobic exercise intensity in cardiac patients and healthy subjects. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021; 31(9):1796-1808. PMC: 8456830. DOI: 10.1111/sms.14007. View

2.
Atkinson G, Batterham A . True and false interindividual differences in the physiological response to an intervention. Exp Physiol. 2015; 100(6):577-88. DOI: 10.1113/EP085070. View

3.
Baldwin J, Snow R, Febbraio M . Effect of training status and relative exercise intensity on physiological responses in men. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32(9):1648-54. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200009000-00020. View

4.
Bentley R, Walsh J, Drouin P, Velickovic A, Kitner S, Fenuta A . Absence of compensatory vasodilation with perfusion pressure challenge in exercise: evidence for and implications of the noncompensator phenotype. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2017; 124(2):374-387. PMC: 5867373. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00952.2016. View

5.
Bergstrom H, Housh T, Zuniga J, Camic C, Traylor D, Schmidt R . A new single work bout test to estimate critical power and anaerobic work capacity. J Strength Cond Res. 2012; 26(3):656-63. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31822b7304. View