Cross-Platform Analysis of Mammography Narratives: A Comparative Study on Social Media Engagement

Overview

Journal J Patient Cent Res Rev

Date 2025 Feb 5

PMID 39906608

Authors

Thomas Stirrat

Jonathan Garner

Parth Tailor

Daniel Weitz

Muhammad Umair

Yusuf T Akpolat

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the representation of mammography on social media platforms, specifically, X (Twitter), Facebook, TikTok, and Instagram, from 2006 to 2023. X (Twitter) went public in 2006, Facebook in 2004, Instagram in 2012, and TikTok in 2018 (after merging with Musical.ly). The analysis starts from after the public launch years to analyze personal experiences shared online.

Methods: A retrospective content analysis was conducted on 1,771 posts using specific hashtags related to mammography. Posts were categorized into themes including emotional and psychological impacts, clinical and procedural details, and social and supportive interactions. The analysis involved summarizing the distribution of themes across different social media platforms, focusing on frequency counts and percentages.

Results: The analysis revealed that, among included posts, Instagram hosted the most discussions (621 posts), followed by TikTok (457 posts), X (Twitter) (403 posts), and Facebook (290 posts). Key themes identified included raising awareness (1,735 posts), spreading positivity (1,675 posts), and discussing clinical aspects, such as diagnosis (1,197 posts) and quality of life (1,011 posts). Posts often highlighted concerns about discomfort (701 posts) and anxiety (835 posts) related to mammography, while also emphasizing the importance of early detection and the support found within online communities.

Conclusions: Social media serves as a powerful tool for public health communication, offering a mix of positive narratives and highlighting concerns about mammography. The significant engagement from the general public reflects a diverse array of perspectives that can inform future health communication strategies.

References

Hewis J . Do MRI Patients Tweet? Thematic Analysis of Patient Tweets About Their MRI Experience. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2019; 46(4):396-402. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2015.08.003. View

Prabhu V, Lee T, Loeb S, Holmes J, Gold H, Lepor H . Twitter response to the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations against screening with prostate-specific antigen. BJU Int. 2014; 116(1):65-71. PMC: 4216238. DOI: 10.1111/bju.12748. View

Nayyar S, Chakole S, Taksande A, Prasad R, Munjewar P, Wanjari M . From Awareness to Action: A Review of Efforts to Reduce Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening. Cureus. 2023; 15(6):e40674. PMC: 10359048. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40674. View

Smith R, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Brooks D, Doroshenk M, Fedewa S, Saslow D . Cancer screening in the United States, 2015: a review of current American cancer society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015; 65(1):30-54. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21261. View

Dobrossy B, Girasek E, Susanszky A, Koncz Z, Gyorffy Z, Bognar V . "Clicks, likes, shares and comments" a systematic review of breast cancer screening discourse in social media. PLoS One. 2020; 15(4):e0231422. PMC: 7159232. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231422. View

Attai D, Cowher M, Al-Hamadani M, Schoger J, Staley A, Landercasper J . Twitter Social Media is an Effective Tool for Breast Cancer Patient Education and Support: Patient-Reported Outcomes by Survey. J Med Internet Res. 2015; 17(7):e188. PMC: 4705354. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4721. View

Loberg M, Lousdal M, Bretthauer M, Kalager M . Benefits and harms of mammography screening. Breast Cancer Res. 2015; 17:63. PMC: 4415291. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-015-0525-z. View

Suarez-Lledo V, Alvarez-Galvez J . Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(1):e17187. PMC: 7857950. DOI: 10.2196/17187. View

Ventola C . Social media and health care professionals: benefits, risks, and best practices. P T. 2014; 39(7):491-520. PMC: 4103576. View

10.

Breen N, Cronin K, Meissner H, Taplin S, Tangka F, Tiro J . Reported drop in mammography : is this cause for concern?. Cancer. 2007; 109(12):2405-9. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22723. View

11.

Coughlin S, Thompson T, Seeff L, Richards T, Stallings F . Breast, cervical, and colorectal carcinoma screening in a demographically defined region of the southern U.S. Cancer. 2002; 95(10):2211-22. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10933. View

12.

Chen J, Wang Y . Social Media Use for Health Purposes: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(5):e17917. PMC: 8156131. DOI: 10.2196/17917. View

13.

Campbell R, Ju A, King M, Rutherford C . Perceived benefits and limitations of using patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice with individual patients: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Qual Life Res. 2021; 31(6):1597-1620. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-03003-z. View

14.

Nastasi A, Bryant T, Canner J, Dredze M, Camp M, Nagarajan N . Breast Cancer Screening and Social Media: a Content Analysis of Evidence Use and Guideline Opinions on Twitter. J Cancer Educ. 2017; 33(3):695-702. DOI: 10.1007/s13187-017-1168-9. View

15.

Basch C, MacLean S . Breast Cancer on Instagram: A Descriptive Study. Int J Prev Med. 2020; 10:166. PMC: 6826772. DOI: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_36_19. View

16.

Feig S . Screening mammography benefit controversies: sorting the evidence. Radiol Clin North Am. 2014; 52(3):455-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2014.02.009. View

17.

Lee C, Dershaw D, Kopans D, Evans P, Monsees B, Monticciolo D . Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010; 7(1):18-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.09.022. View

18.

Cook N, Mullins A, Gautam R, Medi S, Prince C, Tyagi N . Evaluating Patient Experiences in Dry Eye Disease Through Social Media Listening Research. Ophthalmol Ther. 2019; 8(3):407-420. PMC: 6692792. DOI: 10.1007/s40123-019-0188-4. View

19.

Agarwal N, Rahman A, Jacobs R, Taylor T, Muthiah N, Alan N . Patient perception of scoliosis correction surgery on Instagram. Neurosurg Focus. 2021; 51(5):E6. DOI: 10.3171/2021.8.FOCUS201015. View

20.

Mylod D . Breast feeding a sick child; can social media influence practice?. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 2015; 38(2):77-84. DOI: 10.3109/01460862.2015.1009584. View