» Articles » PMID: 39906589

Same Trait, Different Genes: Pelvic Spine Loss in Three Brook Stickleback Populations in Alberta, Canada

Overview
Journal Evol Lett
Date 2025 Feb 5
PMID 39906589
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The genetic basis of phenotypic or adaptive parallelism can reveal much about constraints on evolution. This study investigated the genetic basis of a canonically parallel trait: pelvic spine reduction in sticklebacks. Pelvic reduction has a highly parallel genetic basis in threespine stickleback in populations around the world, always involving a deletion of the pel1 enhancer of . We conducted a genome-wide association study to investigate the genetic basis of pelvic spine reduction in 3 populations of brook stickleback in Alberta, Canada. Pelvic reduction did not involve in any of the 3 populations. Instead, pelvic reduction in 1 population involved a mutation in an exon of , and it involved a mutation in an intron of in the other two populations. Hence, the parallel phenotypic evolution of pelvic spine reduction across stickleback genera, and among brook stickleback populations, has a nonparallel genetic basis. This suggests that there may be redundancy in the genetic basis of this adaptive polymorphism, but it is not clear whether a lack of parallelism indicates a lack of constraint on the evolution of this adaptive trait. Whether different pleiotropic effects of different mutations have different fitness consequences or whether certain pelvic reduction mutations confer specific benefits in certain environments remains to be determined.

Citing Articles

Evidence for Variation in the Genetic Basis of Sex Determination in Brook Stickleback ().

Pigott G, Akel M, Rogers M, Flanagan M, Marlette E, Treaster M Ecol Evol. 2025; 15(2):e70955.

PMID: 39944908 PMC: 11815241. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70955.

References
1.
James M, Brodribb T, Wright I, Rieseberg L, Ortiz-Barrientos D . Replicated Evolution in Plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2023; 74:697-725. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-071221-090809. View

2.
Miller S, Barrueto M, Schluter D . A comparative analysis of experimental selection on the stickleback pelvis. J Evol Biol. 2017; 30(6):1165-1176. DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13085. View

3.
Bell M, Orti G, Walker J, Koenings J . EVOLUTION OF PELVIC REDUCTION IN THREESPINE STICKLEBACK FISH: A TEST OF COMPETING HYPOTHESES. Evolution. 2017; 47(3):906-914. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01243.x. View

4.
Coyle S, Huntingford F, Peichel C . Parallel evolution of Pitx1 underlies pelvic reduction in Scottish threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). J Hered. 2007; 98(6):581-6. DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esm066. View

5.
Chan Y, Marks M, Jones F, Villarreal Jr G, Shapiro M, Brady S . Adaptive evolution of pelvic reduction in sticklebacks by recurrent deletion of a Pitx1 enhancer. Science. 2009; 327(5963):302-5. PMC: 3109066. DOI: 10.1126/science.1182213. View