Ethics and End-of-life in Pediatric and Neonatal ICUs: a Systematic Review of Recommendations

Overview

Journal BMC Palliat Care

Publisher Biomed Central

Date 2025 Feb 5

PMID 39905352

Authors

Diana Spoljar

Suncana Jankovic

Dina Vrkic

Geraldine McNamara

Marko Curkovic

Milivoj Novak

Boris Filipovic-Grcic

Stefan Grosek

Chris Gastmans

Bert Gordijn

Ana Borovecki

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Working in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) or pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) entails making difficult decisions about children at the end of their lives that raise significant ethical issues. This review identified the ethical content of the papers containing expert guidelines and recommendations in relation to end-of-life decision-making in NICUs and PICUs, by analyzing ethical positions and ethical principles behind them.

Methods: Systematic search was limited to the period from 1990 to 2023 and encompassed 6 bibliographic databases (Medline, PubMed, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus), grey literature sources and relevant reference lists. The international, national, or institutional papers providing expert guidelines and recommendations comprehensively addressing either withholding/withdrawing of life sustaining treatment, palliative care, and/or intentional life terminating actions in NICUs and PICUs were included in analysis. Also, only papers published in English language were considered. Papers that were not developed by intensive care expert communities and those that were either too narrow (e.g., dealing with specific issues or specific patient groups) or broad (e.g., addressing issues of interest on general and abstract level) were excluded. The search data were gathered and deduplicated, partly by Mendeley software. Titles and abstracts were screened by three independent reviewers, and full-text papers further reviewed and assessed for eligibility. Subsequently, data of interest were extracted, and qualitative analysis was performed.

Results: Initial search retrieved 6784 papers from bibliographic databases and 363 from other utilized sources. Titles and abstracts from 2827 papers were screened. 17 full texts were further assessed resulting in a total number of 9 papers (6 from bibliographic databases and 3 from other sources) which met the inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. The papers were published from 2001 to 2021. Four papers primarily focus on NICU setting, while five on PICU. A total of 38 ethical positions were identified and were grouped under 5 themes according to the content of the positions, relating to: patients, parents, medical team, decision-making and treatment options. A total of 12 ethical principles were mentioned in the papers. The principle of beneficence emerged as the most prominent one. It was explicitly mentioned in all included papers except one.

Conclusions: This review has shown that papers containing guidelines and recommendations on end-of-life decision-making in the NICU and PICU promote similar stances. The ethical principle of beneficence is at the core of the decision-making process, and all decisions are made focusing on the child's best interests.

References

Zhong Y, Cavolo A, Labarque V, Gastmans C . Physician decision-making process about withholding/withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in paediatric patients: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. BMC Palliat Care. 2022; 21(1):113. PMC: 9229823. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-022-01003-5. View

Prins S, Linn A, van Kaam A, van de Loo M, van Woensel J, VAN Heerde M . How Physicians Discuss Uncertainty With Parents in Intensive Care Units. Pediatrics. 2022; 149(6). DOI: 10.1542/peds.2021-055980. View

Wool J, Irving S, Meghani S, Ulrich C . Parental Decision-Making in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: An Integrative Review. J Fam Nurs. 2021; 27(2):154-167. DOI: 10.1177/1074840720975869. View

Walther F . Withholding treatment, withdrawing treatment, and palliative care in the neonatal intensive care unit. Early Hum Dev. 2005; 81(12):965-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.10.004. View

. Cancer pain relief and palliative care. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1990; 804:1-75. View

Weise K, Okun A, Carter B, Christian C . Guidance on Forgoing Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment. Pediatrics. 2017; 140(3). DOI: 10.1542/peds.2017-1905. View

Benini F, Papadatou D, Bernada M, Craig F, De Zen L, Downing J . International Standards for Pediatric Palliative Care: From IMPaCCT to GO-PPaCS. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022; 63(5):e529-e543. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.12.031. View

Penticuff J, Arheart K . Effectiveness of an intervention to improve parent-professional collaboration in neonatal intensive care. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2005; 19(2):187-202. DOI: 10.1097/00005237-200504000-00016. View

Zhong Y, Cavolo A, Labarque V, Gastmans C . Physicians' attitudes and experiences about withholding/withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in pediatrics: a systematic review of quantitative evidence. BMC Palliat Care. 2023; 22(1):145. PMC: 10540364. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01260-y. View

10.

Richards C, Starks H, OConnor M, Bourget E, Hays R, Doorenbos A . Physicians Perceptions of Shared Decision-Making in Neonatal and Pediatric Critical Care. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017; 35(4):669-676. PMC: 5673589. DOI: 10.1177/1049909117734843. View

11.

Sklansky M . Neonatal euthanasia: moral considerations and criminal liability. J Med Ethics. 2001; 27(1):5-11. PMC: 1733340. DOI: 10.1136/jme.27.1.5. View

12.

Orioles A, Morrison W . Medical ethics in pediatric critical care. Crit Care Clin. 2013; 29(2):359-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccc.2012.12.002. View

13.

Verhagen E, Sauer P . The Groningen protocol--euthanasia in severely ill newborns. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352(10):959-62. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp058026. View

14.

Kredo T, Bernhardsson S, Machingaidze S, Young T, Louw Q, Ochodo E . Guide to clinical practice guidelines: the current state of play. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016; 28(1):122-8. PMC: 4767049. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv115. View

15.

Buang S, Loh S, Mok Y, Lee J, Chan Y . Palliative and Critical Care: Their Convergence in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Front Pediatr. 2022; 10:907268. PMC: 9226486. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.907268. View

16.

Grosek S, Orazem M, Kanic M, Vidmar G, Groselj U . Attitudes of Slovene paediatricians to end-of-life care. J Paediatr Child Health. 2015; 52(3):278-83. DOI: 10.1111/jpc.13006. View

17.

Keogh S, Long D, Horn D . Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia management of critically ill children: a pilot study evaluating guideline impact and feasibility in the PICU. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(3):e006428. PMC: 4386214. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006428. View

18.

Willems D, Verhagen A, van Wijlick E . Infants' best interests in end-of-life care for newborns. Pediatrics. 2014; 134(4):e1163-8. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2014-0780. View

19.

Spoljar D, Curkovic M, Gastmans C, Gordijn B, Vrkic D, Jozepovic A . Ethical content of expert recommendations for end-of-life decision-making in intensive care units: A systematic review. J Crit Care. 2020; 58:10-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.03.010. View

20.

Hubert P, Canoui P, Cremer R, Leclerc F . [Withholding or withdrawing life saving treatment in pediatric intensive care unit: GFRUP guidelines]. Arch Pediatr. 2005; 12(10):1501-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.arcped.2005.04.085. View