ESTRO Guidelines for Developing Questionnaires in Survey-based Radiation Oncology Research

Overview

Journal Clin Transl Radiat Oncol

Date 2025 Feb 3

PMID 39898327

Authors

Amanda Webster

Lotte S Fog

Emma Hall

Peter S N van Rossum

Daan Nevens

Pierre Montay-Gruel

Pierfrancesco Franco

Elizabeth Joyce

Nuria Jornet

Catharine H Clark

Jenny Bertholet

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Survey-based research is increasingly used in radiation oncology, yet survey-based research methodology is often unfamiliar in the field. This guideline offers comprehensive instructions for conducting survey-based research in radiation oncology, covering critical aspects such as survey design, validation, dissemination, analysis, and reporting. Tailored to professionals, it emphasizes the importance of methodological rigour to ensure reliable and actionable data collection. Dissemination strategies are highlighted to maximize response rates and enhance data completeness across diverse clinical, research and industrial settings. Rigorous analysis techniques are discussed to uncover insights that optimize operational efficiencies and inform evidence-based practices. Transparent reporting is underscored as crucial for enhancing the credibility and applicability of findings. This guideline aims to be a practical resource for enhancing research standards in survey-based research for researchers and practitioners in radiation oncology.

References

Bertholet J, Anastasi G, Noble D, Bel A, van Leeuwen R, Roggen T . Patterns of practice for adaptive and real-time radiation therapy (POP-ART RT) part II: Offline and online plan adaption for interfractional changes. Radiother Oncol. 2020; 153:88-96. PMC: 7758781. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.06.017. View

Garibaldi C, Essers M, Heijmen B, Bertholet J, Koutsouveli E, Maas A . Towards an updated ESTRO-EFOMP core curriculum for education and training of medical physics experts in radiotherapy - A survey of current education and training practice in Europe. Phys Med. 2021; 84:65-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.03.030. View

Coffey M, Naseer A, Leech M . Exploring radiation therapist education and training. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2022; 24:59-62. PMC: 9552092. DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.09.006. View

Zhang Y, Trnkova P, Toshito T, Heijmen B, Richter C, Aznar M . A survey of practice patterns for real-time intrafractional motion-management in particle therapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2023; 26:100439. PMC: 10133874. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100439. View

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. PMC: 2707599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. View

Tavakol M, Dennick R . Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2016; 2:53-55. PMC: 4205511. DOI: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd. View

Ben Mustapha S, Meijnders P, Jansen N, Lakosi F, Coucke P . The status of radiation oncology (RO) teaching to medical students in Europe. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2019; 17:40-46. PMC: 6538841. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.04.010. View

Di Tella M, Tesio V, Bertholet J, Gasnier A, Portillo E, Spalek M . Professional quality of life and burnout among medical physicists working in radiation oncology: The role of alexithymia and empathy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021; 15:38-43. PMC: 7807595. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.07.001. View

Gasnier A, Jereczek-Fossa B, Pepa M, Bagnardi V, Frassoni S, Perryck S . Establishing a benchmark of diversity, equity, inclusion and workforce engagement in radiation oncology in Europe - An ESTRO collaborative project. Radiother Oncol. 2022; 171:198-204. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.04.011. View

10.

Rosenblatt E, Fidarova E, Ghosh S, Zubizarreta E, Unterkirhere O, Semikoz N . Quality of radiotherapy services in post-Soviet countries: An IAEA survey. Radiother Oncol. 2018; 127(2):171-177. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.03.028. View

11.

Becker R . The effects of a special sequential mixed-mode design, and reminders, on panellists' participation in a probability-based panel study. Qual Quant. 2021; 56(1):259-284. PMC: 7937431. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-021-01126-6. View

12.

Sharma A, Duc N, Luu Lam Thang T, Nam N, Ng S, Abbas K . A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS). J Gen Intern Med. 2021; 36(10):3179-3187. PMC: 8481359. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06737-1. View

13.

Fog L, Wirth A, MacManus M, Downes S, Grace M, Moggre A . Total body irradiation in Australia and New Zealand: results of a practice survey. Phys Eng Sci Med. 2020; 43(3):825-835. DOI: 10.1007/s13246-020-00878-z. View

14.

Li B, Shamsuddin A, Braga L . A guide to evaluating survey research methodology in pediatric urology. J Pediatr Urol. 2021; 17(2):263-268. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.01.009. View

15.

Fairweather D, Taylor R, Simoes R . Choosing the right questions - A systematic review of patient reported outcome measures used in radiotherapy and proton beam therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2023; 191:110071. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110071. View

16.

Kishore K, Jaswal V, Kulkarni V, De D . Practical Guidelines to Develop and Evaluate a Questionnaire. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2021; 12(2):266-275. PMC: 8088187. DOI: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_674_20. View

17.

Brasel K, Haider A, Haukoos J . Practical Guide to Survey Research. JAMA Surg. 2020; 155(4):351-352. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4401. View

18.

Schroeck H, Wiredu K, Ko T, Record D, Sirovich B . Survey research in anesthesiology: a field guide to interpretation. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020; 45(7):544-551. DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101299. View

19.

Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021; 10(1):89. PMC: 8008539. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4. View

20.

Pitt S, Schwartz T, Chu D . AAPOR Reporting Guidelines for Survey Studies. JAMA Surg. 2021; 156(8):785-786. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0543. View