» Articles » PMID: 39898219

Coracoacromial Ligament Integrity Influences Scapular Spine Strain After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Overview
Journal JSES Int
Date 2025 Feb 3
PMID 39898219
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The purpose of this biomechanical study was to examine the effect of coracoacromial (CA) ligament state (intact vs. released) and arm position on acromial and scapular spine strain following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA).

Methods: Eight cadaveric shoulders were implanted with a custom rTSA system and tested using an in-vitro shoulder simulator. The specimens were cycled through static range of motion in both abduction and forward elevation; first with the CA ligament in the "intact" state followed by the "released" state. Scapular spine strain was quantified via 4 strain gauges placed along anatomic locations on the acromion and scapular spine.

Results: Increases in strain were observed across all 4 strain gauge locations upon release of the CA ligament in both 0° of abduction and forward elevation. Increases in the mean strain were observed to be as great as 14% in abduction and 31% in forward elevation. The increases in strain at 0° elevation approached but did not reach statistical significance ( ≥ .072). At 90° of abduction and forward elevation, no increases in the mean strain were observed. The greatest strain was consistently observed with the arm positioned in 0° of forward elevation ( < .001).

Discussion: CA ligament release in the setting of rTSA resulted in increased scapular spine and acromial strain with the arm adducted, although these increases in strain were not statistically significant. Caution should be taken intraoperatively as the release of the CA ligament may alter scapular spine and acromion stresses from deltoid loading, which may increase the risk for postoperative scapular spine fracture.

References
1.
Su W, Budoff J, Luo Z . The effect of coracoacromial ligament excision and acromioplasty on superior and anterosuperior glenohumeral stability. Arthroscopy. 2008; 25(1):13-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.10.004. View

2.
Langohr G, Giles J, Athwal G, Johnson J . The effect of glenosphere diameter in reverse shoulder arthroplasty on muscle force, joint load, and range of motion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 24(6):972-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.018. View

3.
Taylor S, Shah S, Chen X, Gentile J, Gulotta L, Dines J . Scapular Ring Preservation: Coracoacromial Ligament Transection Increases Scapular Spine Strains Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020; 102(15):1358-1364. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01118. View

4.
Collin P, Herve A, Walch G, Boileau P, Muniandy M, Chelli M . Mid-term results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis with posterior glenoid deficiency and humeral subluxation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019; 28(10):2023-2030. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.03.002. View

5.
Haidamous G, Ladermann A, Frankle M, Gorman 2nd R, Denard P . The risk of postoperative scapular spine fracture following reverse shoulder arthroplasty is increased with an onlay humeral stem. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020; 29(12):2556-2563. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.03.036. View