What Activities Do Patients Hope to Perform Following Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty but Are Unable To? Looking Beyond Patient-reported Outcome Measures

Overview

Journal JSES Int

Date 2025 Feb 3

PMID 39898198

Authors

Alexander E White

Nicolas Pascual-Leone

Anthony Finocchiaro

Christopher M Brusalis

David M Dines

Joshua S Dines

Andreas Kontaxis

Samuel A Taylor

Lawrence V Gulotta

Michael C Fu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) routinely achieve significant improvements in common patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). While these structured PROMs produce reliable and standardized data for surgeons, individual patient desires and expectations related to postoperative activities may not be completely captured in standard PROMs. The purpose of the present study was to identify specific activities, sports, and/or hobbies that patients wish they could perform but are unable to following aTSA at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively.

Methods: Patients who underwent primary aTSA, with a primary diagnosis of glenohumeral osteoarthritis between February 1, 2016 and January 1, 2021, were identified using an institutional clinical registry. A survey was sent to patients at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively, which included a free-text-response section in addition to 8 selection-based questions assessing patients' ability to perform various activities.

Results: The survey was sent to 601 patients and 395 responded (65.7% response rate). The mean age at the time of the surgery for responders was 65.75 ± 8.8 years. There was no significant difference in age ( = .095), sex ( = .691), race ( = .090), or ethnicity ( = .054) between responders and nonresponders. The majority of patients had no difficulty managing toileting (93.7%), driving a car (92.4%), washing their hair (91.9%), and putting on a seatbelt (90.7%). Of the 395 total responders, 131 (33.2%) patients reported at least one desired activity that they could not perform. Of these 131 patients, weightlifting (14.5%), throwing a ball (12.9%), playing tennis (11.4%), carrying/holding groceries (11.4%), and performing pushups/planks (11.4%) were most commonly reported.

Conclusion: Following aTSA, patients are able to perform the majority of activities of daily living without difficulty. A subset of patients desire but are unable to participate in several sports and hobbies following aTSA-most commonly, weightlifting, tennis, throwing a ball, and swimming. These limitations present opportunities for further improvements in postoperative outcomes.

References

Garcia G, Liu J, Sinatro A, Wu H, Dines J, Warren R . High Satisfaction and Return to Sports After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients Aged 55 Years and Younger. Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45(7):1664-1669. DOI: 10.1177/0363546517695220. View

Triplet J, Everding N, Levy J, Moor M . Functional internal rotation after shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 24(6):867-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.002. View

Papalia R, Ciuffreda M, Albo E, De Andreis C, Diaz Balzani L, Alifano A . Return to Sport after Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Elderly Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2020; 9(5). PMC: 7291255. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051576. View

Kuffer J, Taha M, Hoffmeyer P, Cunningham G . Return to sport after shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev. 2021; 6(9):771-778. PMC: 8489481. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200147. View

Simovitch R, Flurin P, Wright T, Zuckerman J, Roche C . Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: the substantial clinical benefit. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018; 27(5):903-911. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.12.014. View

Richards R, An K, Bigliani L, Friedman R, Gartsman G, Gristina A . A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012; 3(6):347-52. DOI: 10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80019-0. View

Simovitch R, Flurin P, Wright T, Zuckerman J, Roche C . Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017; 27(2):298-305. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.013. View

Roach K, Budiman-Mak E, Songsiridej N, Lertratanakul Y . Development of a shoulder pain and disability index. Arthritis Care Res. 1991; 4(4):143-9. View

Liu J, Steinhaus M, Garcia G, Chang B, Fields K, Dines D . Return to sport after shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017; 26(1):100-112. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4547-1. View

10.

Michael R, Williams B, Laguerre M, Struk A, Schoch B, Wright T . Correlation of multiple patient-reported outcome measures across follow-up in patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019; 28(10):1869-1876. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.02.023. View

11.

Ziedas A, Abed V, Swantek A, Rahman T, Cross A, Thomashow K . Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Instruments Compare Favorably With Legacy Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Upper- and Lower-Extremity Orthopaedic Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Arthroscopy. 2021; 38(2):609-631. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.05.031. View

12.

Liu E, Kord D, Horner N, Leroux T, Alolabi B, Khan M . Stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020; 29(9):1928-1937. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.022. View

13.

Constant C, Murley A . A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987; (214):160-4. View

14.

Bido J, Sullivan S, Carr 2nd J, Schairer W, Nwachukwu B . PROMIS Global-10 performs poorly relative to legacy shoulder instruments in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral arthritis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020; 30(8):1780-1786. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.10.021. View

15.

Best M, Aziz K, Wilckens J, McFarland E, Srikumaran U . Increasing incidence of primary reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020; 30(5):1159-1166. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.08.010. View

16.

Jacobs C, Morris B, Sciascia A, Edwards T . Comparison of satisfied and dissatisfied patients 2 to 5 years after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016; 25(7):1128-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.12.001. View