Progress in the Application of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance to Predict Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation: A Systematic Review and -analysis

Overview

Journal Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc

Date 2025 Feb 3

PMID 39897420

Authors

Cuncun Yu

Zhenjuan Liu

Shiyu Zhu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: This systematic review and -analysis aimed to assess changes in left atrial structure and function at baseline and after catheter ablation and their association with atrial fibrillation recurrence using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods: As of June 2024, a total of 3086 articles have been obtained through searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Standard mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were used to examine structural and functional changes of left atrium after catheter ablation and their relationship with recurrence of atrial fibrillation.

Results: A total of 13 prospective cohort studies were included in the analysis. Decreased left atrial emptying capacity is seen in the short term after catheter ablation, and structural changes in the left atrium are seen in the long term (EFActive: SMD, 1.23, 95 % CI, 1.10-2.36, p < 0.05; EFTotal: SMD, 0.83, 95 % CI, 0.02-1.64, p < 0.05; MinLAV: SMD, 0.30, 95 % CI, 0.01-0.59, p < 0.05). Decrease in left atrial volume after catheter ablationis positively associated with the risk of recurrence of atrial fibrillation. (MaxLAV: SMD, 1.27, 95 % CI, 0.05, 2.49, p < 0.05; MaxLAVi: SMD, 0.48, 95 % CI, 0.05,0.9, p < 0.05;MinLAVi: SMD, 0.78, 95 % CI, 0.39,1.16, p < 0.05). The larger the left atrial volume and the lower the emptying and strain function, the greater the likelihood of recurrence of atrial fibrillation following catheter ablation, (MaxLAV: SMD, 0.38, 95 % CI, 0.18,0.59, p < 0.05;MinLAV: SMD, 0.83,95 % CI, 0.41,1.24, p < 0.05; MaxLAVi: SMD, 0.35, 95 % CI, 0.21,0.50, p < 0.05;MinLAVi: SMD, 0.62, 95 % CI, 0.47,0.78, p < 0.05; EFPassive: SMD, -0.57, 95 % CI, -0.78, -0.37, p < 0.05; EFActive: SMD, -0.62, 95 % CI, -1.08, -0.15, P < 0.05; EFTotal: SMD, -0.70, 95 % CI, -0.97, -0.44, P < 0.05; ℇCT: SMD, -0.61, 95 % CI, -0.90, -0.32, p < 0.05; PLAS: SMD, -1.22, 95 % CI, -1.87, -0.57, p < 0.05; ℇR: SMD, -0.50, 95 % CI, -0.79, -0.21, p < 0.05; PLAS: SMD, -1.22, 95 % CI, -1.87, -0.57, p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Short-term left atrial functional impairment can be observed after catheter ablation, while long-term reduction in left atrial volume can be seen. Changes in left atrial volume are likely to lead to the recurrence of atrial fibrillation, while alterations in left atrial function help maintain sinus rhythm. Larger left atrial volume and lower emptying and strain function at baseline assessment by cardiac magnetic resonance are more likely to lead to recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation, which may be useful to identify those for whom catheter ablation has reduced success or for whom more aggressive ablation or medications may be useful.

References

Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

Ipek E, Marine J, Habibi M, Chrispin J, Lima J, Rickard J . Association of left atrial function with incident atypical atrial flutter after atrial fibrillation ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2015; 13(2):391-8. PMC: 4724482. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.09.028. View

Fukumoto K, Habibi M, Ipek E, Khurram I, Zimmerman S, Zipunnikov V . Comparison of preexisting and ablation-induced late gadolinium enhancement on left atrial magnetic resonance imaging. Heart Rhythm. 2014; 12(4):668-72. PMC: 4373982. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.12.021. View

Habibi M, Lima J, Khurram I, Zimmerman S, Zipunnikov V, Fukumoto K . Association of left atrial function and left atrial enhancement in patients with atrial fibrillation: cardiac magnetic resonance study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 8(2):e002769. PMC: 4319560. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002769. View

Dodson J, Neilan T, Shah R, Farhad H, Blankstein R, Steigner M . Left atrial passive emptying function determined by cardiac magnetic resonance predicts atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014; 7(4):586-92. PMC: 4219259. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.001472. View

Hopman L, Mulder M, van der Laan A, Bhagirath P, Demirkiran A, von Bartheld M . Left atrial strain is associated with arrhythmia recurrence after atrial fibrillation ablation: Cardiac magnetic resonance rapid strain vs. feature tracking strain. Int J Cardiol. 2023; 378:23-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.02.019. View

Nakamori S, Ngo L, Tugal D, Manning W, Nezafat R . Incremental Value of Left Atrial Geometric Remodeling in Predicting Late Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Pulmonary Vein Isolation: A Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018; 7(19):e009793. PMC: 6404907. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009793. View

Csecs I, Yamaguchi T, Kheirkhahan M, Czimbalmos C, Fochler F, Kholmovski E . Left atrial functional and structural changes associated with ablation of atrial fibrillation - Cardiac magnetic resonance study. Int J Cardiol. 2019; 305:154-160. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.12.010. View

Habibi M, Lima J, Ipek E, Zimmerman S, Zipunnikov V, Spragg D . The association of baseline left atrial structure and function measured with cardiac magnetic resonance and pulmonary vein isolation outcome in patients with drug-refractory atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2016; 13(5):1037-1044. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.01.016. View

10.

Akoum N, Wilber D, Hindricks G, Jais P, Cates J, Marchlinski F . MRI Assessment of Ablation-Induced Scarring in Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis from the DECAAF Study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015; 26(5):473-80. DOI: 10.1111/jce.12650. View

11.

Poole J, Bahnson T, Monahan K, Johnson G, Rostami H, Silverstein A . Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation or Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in the CABANA Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 75(25):3105-3118. PMC: 8064404. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.065. View

12.

Ciuffo L, Tao S, Ipek E, Zghaib T, Balouch M, Lima J . Intra-Atrial Dyssynchrony During Sinus Rhythm Predicts Recurrence After the First Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018; 12(2):310-319. PMC: 6043414. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.11.028. View

13.

Chubb H, Karim R, Mukherjee R, Williams S, Whitaker J, Harrison J . A comprehensive multi-index cardiac magnetic resonance-guided assessment of atrial fibrillation substrate prior to ablation: Prediction of long-term outcomes. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019; 30(10):1894-1903. DOI: 10.1111/jce.14111. View

14.

Kuppahally S, Akoum N, Burgon N, Badger T, Kholmovski E, Vijayakumar S . Left atrial strain and strain rate in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation: relationship to left atrial structural remodeling detected by delayed-enhancement MRI. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010; 3(3):231-9. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.865683. View

15.

Van Gelder I, Rienstra M, Bunting K, Casado-Arroyo R, Caso V, Crijns H . 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2024; 45(36):3314-3414. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae176. View

16.

Tsang T, Gersh B, Appleton C, Tajik A, Barnes M, Bailey K . Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction as a predictor of the first diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in 840 elderly men and women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 40(9):1636-44. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02373-2. View

17.

den Uijl D, Cabanelas N, Benito E, Figueras R, Alarcon F, Borras R . Impact of left atrial volume, sphericity, and fibrosis on the outcome of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018; 29(5):740-746. DOI: 10.1111/jce.13482. View

18.

Habibi M, Lima J, Ipek E, Spragg D, Ashikaga H, Marine J . Short- and long-term associations of atrial fibrillation catheter ablation with left atrial structure and function: A cardiac magnetic resonance study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020; 32(2):316-324. PMC: 7878398. DOI: 10.1111/jce.14842. View

19.

Gastl M, Bejinariu A, Behm P, Lindert A, Kelm M, Makimoto H . Role of CMR-derived atrial deformation analysis in the prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence rate after pulmonary vein isolation. Eur J Radiol. 2022; 155:110452. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110452. View

20.

Benjamin M, Moulki N, Waqar A, Ravipati H, Schoenecker N, Wilber D . Association of left atrial strain by cardiovascular magnetic resonance with recurrence of atrial fibrillation following catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2022; 24(1):3. PMC: 8722067. DOI: 10.1186/s12968-021-00831-3. View