» Articles » PMID: 39896975

The Relationship Between Timing of Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Maternal and Fetal Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study Linking Primary Care Electronic and Hospital Administrative Data

Overview
Journal Obes Pillars
Date 2025 Feb 3
PMID 39896975
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Gestational diabetes (GDM) is associated with adverse outcomes including a large-for-gestational age (LGA) baby, which in turn is associated with downstream childhood obesity. Appropriate timing of GDM screening is important for prompt initiation and optimization of medical management, potentially mitigating the risk of those outcomes. The present study explored the association between the timing of GDM screening and macrosomia, LGA, shoulder dystocia and caesarean section.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study linked primary care prenatal data and intrapartum data from a provincial hospital administrative database. Women with singleton pregnancies who received prenatal care between July 1, 2019 and December 31, 2022 and who also delivered within that timeframe were included in the study.

Results: 198 participants were linked between the databases. Among participants for whom GDM risk could be calculated (n = 180), 30.6 % had late GDM screening. Unadjusted logistic regression models showed that late screening for GDM was associated with higher likelihood of LGA (OR = 2.89; 95 % CI = 1.19-7.04; p = 00.019). Adjusted models showed that the best predictor of macrosomia, LGA, and shoulder dystocia was excess gestational weight gain (GWG) (OR = 3.26, CI = 1.17-9.10, p = 0.024; OR 3.00, 95 % CI 0.91-9.93, p = 00.072; and OR = 3.52, CI = 0.83-14.84, p = 00.087 respectively); the best predictor of caesarean section was pre-pregnancy BMI (OR = 2.86; CI = 1.12 = 7.27; p = 0.028).

Conclusions: Almost one-third of participants had screening later than recommended, and late screening for GDM was associated with a higher likelihood of LGA. Linking longitudinal prenatal primary care data to hospital administrative data creates opportunities for future studies pertaining to prenatal care, potentially resulting in improvements in the care provided to vulnerable populations experiencing disproportionate rates of pre-pregnancy obesity and excess GWG.

References
1.
Tieu J, McPhee A, Crowther C, Middleton P, Shepherd E . Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus based on different risk profiles and settings for improving maternal and infant health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 8:CD007222. PMC: 6483271. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007222.pub4. View

2.
Najafi F, Hasani J, Izadi N, Hashemi-Nazari S, Namvar Z, Shamsi H . Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus by pre-pregnancy body mass index: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021; 15(4):102181. DOI: 10.1016/j.dsx.2021.06.018. View

3.
Palatnik A, Mele L, Landon M, Reddy U, Ramin S, Carpenter M . Timing of treatment initiation for mild gestational diabetes mellitus and perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213(4):560.e1-8. PMC: 4609640. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.022. View

4.
Simmons D, Immanuel J, Hague W, Teede H, Nolan C, Peek M . Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosed Early in Pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2023; 388(23):2132-2144. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2214956. View

5.
Johns E, Denison F, Norman J, Reynolds R . Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Mechanisms, Treatment, and Complications. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2018; 29(11):743-754. DOI: 10.1016/j.tem.2018.09.004. View