» Articles » PMID: 39896196

Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Cardiometabolic Health and Body Composition in Adults with Overweight and Obesity: a Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Front Physiol
Date 2025 Feb 3
PMID 39896196
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effects of blood flow restriction (BFR) training on cardiometabolic health and body composition in adults with overweight and obesity.

Method: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus databases was conducted on 15 March 2024. Pooled effects for each outcome were summarized using Hedge's () through meta-analysis-based random effects models, and subgroup analyses were used to explore moderators.

Results: A total of 11 studies with 242 participants (Age:32.6 ± 3.6, BMI:27.2 ± 3.5) were included. Regarding cardiometabolic health, BFR training significantly reduced systolic blood pressure ( = [0.08, 1.16], = 0.02), while no significant differences were observed in maximal oxygen uptake ( [-0.21, 1.17], = 0.17) or diastolic blood pressure ( [-0.22, 0.84], = 0.25). Regarding body composition, BFR training significantly reduced body fat percentage ( = [0.01, 0.58]; = 0.04), while no significant differences ( > 0.05) were observed in body weight ( [-0.14, 0.42]), body mass index ( [-0.21, 0.38]), waist circumference ( [-0.28, 0.53]), or waist-to-hip ratio ( [-0.19, 1.15]). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in improving systolic blood pressure ( [-0.10, 1.24] vs. = [-0.18, 1.59]) and body fat percentage ( [-0.20, 0.61] vs. [-0.05, 0.95]) between BFR resistance training and BFR aerobic training. In all selected studies, the overall risk of bias was categorized as "some concern". The certainty of evidence for the BFR outcomes was low.

Conclusion: BFR training shows promise in improving cardiometabolic health and body composition, indicating that it may serve as a beneficial, individualized exercise prescription for improving cardiovascular disease risk and fat loss in adults with excess body weight and obesity.

Systematic Review Registration: https://archive.org/details/osf-registrations-uv6jx-v1.

References
1.
Chen Y, Ma C, Wang J, Gu Y, Gao Y . Effects of 40% of Maximum Oxygen Uptake Intensity Cycling Combined with Blood Flow Restriction Training on Body Composition and Serum Biomarkers of Chinese College Students with Obesity. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(1). PMC: 8750492. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19010168. View

2.
Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

3.
Nuttall F . Body Mass Index: Obesity, BMI, and Health: A Critical Review. Nutr Today. 2016; 50(3):117-128. PMC: 4890841. DOI: 10.1097/NT.0000000000000092. View

4.
Spitz R, Chatakondi R, Bell Z, Wong V, Dankel S, Abe T . The impact of cuff width and biological sex on cuff preference and the perceived discomfort to blood-flow-restricted arm exercise. Physiol Meas. 2019; 40(5):055001. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/ab1787. View

5.
Willis L, Slentz C, Bateman L, Shields A, Piner L, Bales C . Effects of aerobic and/or resistance training on body mass and fat mass in overweight or obese adults. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012; 113(12):1831-7. PMC: 3544497. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01370.2011. View