Cuckoo Eyes Are an Important Identification Cue for the Oriental Reed Warbler Host

Overview

Journal Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl

Date 2025 Feb 3

PMID 39896142

Authors

Hanlin Yan

Longwu Wang

Laikun Ma

Wei Liang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Successful recognition of parasites through effective identification cues can reduce the cost of anti-parasitic defenses by the host. Features on the front of the body such as the eyes may be important clues for the prey to perceive and recognize the parasite. In this study, we investigated whether the eyes of common cuckoos (), an obligate avian brood parasite, served as identification cues for its common host, the Oriental reed warbler (). We displayed dummies of 3D printed common cuckoos and Oriental turtle doves () with their eyes covered or not-covered near the nests of breeding Oriental reed warblers to test effect of the eyes on defense behaviors of the warblers towards these dummies. Oriental reed warblers significantly reduced attacks on the common cuckoos with eyes covered compared to those with eyes not-covered. However, there was no significant difference between the attacks on the Oriental turtle doves with not-covered eyes and those with covered eyes. Our results suggest that Oriental reed warblers use cuckoo eyes as an important discrimination cue. We explored for the first time the use of the cuckoo's eye as an important discriminative cue by Oriental reed warblers via visual manipulation of 3D printed cuckoos, which provides a new experimental validation of the host Oriental reed warbler's anti-parasite strategy in terms of visual cues. However, Future research should consider testing more cuckoo species and their hosts and further validating the identification cues of the eyes and other body parts in additional geographic populations.

References

Davies N, Welbergen J . Social transmission of a host defense against cuckoo parasitism. Science. 2009; 324(5932):1318-20. DOI: 10.1126/science.1172227. View

Yang C, Wang L, Cheng S, Hsu Y, Liang W, Moller A . Nest defenses and egg recognition of yellow-bellied prinia against cuckoo parasitism. Naturwissenschaften. 2014; 101(9):727-34. DOI: 10.1007/s00114-014-1209-8. View

Lee S, Hwang S, Joe Y, Cha H, Joo G, Lee H . Direct look from a predator shortens the risk-assessment time by prey. PLoS One. 2013; 8(6):e64977. PMC: 3673954. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064977. View

Gill , Neudorf , Sealy . Host responses to cowbirds near the nest: cues for recognition. Anim Behav. 1997; 53(6):1287-93. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0362. View

Trnka A, Prokop P, Grim T . Uncovering dangerous cheats: how do avian hosts recognize adult brood parasites?. PLoS One. 2012; 7(5):e37445. PMC: 3356260. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037445. View

Grim T, Samas P, Moskat C, Kleven O, Honza M, Moksnes A . Constraints on host choice: why do parasitic birds rarely exploit some common potential hosts?. J Anim Ecol. 2011; 80(3):508-18. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01798.x. View

Emery N . The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2000; 24(6):581-604. DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7634(00)00025-7. View

Ma L, Liu W, Pan P, Hou J, Liang W . Oriental reed warblers retain strong egg recognition abilities during the nestling stage. Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(2):e11063. PMC: 10877555. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11063. View

Zhao H, Luo H, Yan H, He G, Wang L, Liang W . Fatal mobbing and attack of the common cuckoo by its warbler hosts. Ecol Evol. 2022; 12(12):e9649. PMC: 9772492. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9649. View

10.

Welbergen J, Davies N . Strategic variation in mobbing as a front line of defense against brood parasitism. Curr Biol. 2009; 19(3):235-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.12.041. View

11.

Wang L, Zhao H, Luo H, He G, Yan H, Liang W . Importance of cooperation: How host nest defenses effectively prevent brood parasitism from the cuckoos. iScience. 2023; 26(4):106458. PMC: 10090214. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106458. View

12.

Goumas M, Burns I, Kelley L, Boogert N . Herring gulls respond to human gaze direction. Biol Lett. 2019; 15(8):20190405. PMC: 6731478. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0405. View

13.

Novakova N, Vesely P, Fuchs R . Object categorization by wild ranging birds-Winter feeder experiments. Behav Processes. 2017; 143:7-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.08.002. View

14.

Carter J, Lyons N, Cole H, Goldsmith A . Subtle cues of predation risk: starlings respond to a predator's direction of eye-gaze. Proc Biol Sci. 2008; 275(1644):1709-15. PMC: 2587789. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0095. View

15.

Trnka A, Ma L, Yan H, Wang L, Liang W . Defense behavior of two closely related but geographically distant host species against cuckoo parasitism: A next test for the parallel coevolution. Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(6):e10175. PMC: 10251422. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10175. View

16.

Yu J, Lu H, Sun W, Liang W, Wang H, Moller A . Heterospecific alarm-call recognition in two warbler hosts of common cuckoos. Anim Cogn. 2019; 22(6):1149-1157. PMC: 6834739. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-019-01307-9. View

17.

Feeney W, Langmore N . Social learning of a brood parasite by its host. Biol Lett. 2013; 9(4):20130443. PMC: 3730657. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0443. View

18.

Davies N, Welbergen J . Cuckoo-hawk mimicry? An experimental test. Proc Biol Sci. 2008; 275(1644):1817-22. PMC: 2587796. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0331. View

19.

Kyle S . Do Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis) and tufted titmice (Baeolophus bicolor) use predator eyes in risk assessment?. Anim Cogn. 2020; 24(3):533-540. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-020-01449-1. View