» Articles » PMID: 39894043

Impact of Distal Fusion Level on Sacroiliac Joint Degenerative Change Following Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery

Overview
Journal Yonsei Med J
Date 2025 Feb 2
PMID 39894043
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between distal fusion level in correction and fusion surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and radiologic changes in the sacroiliac (SI) joint.

Materials And Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated patients who underwent correction and fusion for AIS between 2005 and 2017 with at least 5 years of follow-up. We categorized patients into two groups: Group 1 (distal fusion above L2, 74 patients) and Group 2 (distal fusion at L3 and below, 52 patients). Radiologic parameters and SI joint changes were evaluated on plain radiographs obtained from preoperative to 5 years postoperatively. We also investigated other risk factors for SI joint change.

Results: Analysis of demographic factors revealed no significant difference between the two groups. There was a significant difference in the incidence of SI joint change between Group 1 (5 patients, 6.75%) and Group 2 (18 patients, 34.61%), with Group 2 showing a faster increase in incidence according to the Kaplan-Meier method (<0.0001). Preoperative lumbar lordosis (LL) and ΔLL had a significant relationship with SI joint changes [preoperative LL, hazard ratio (HR)=0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.64-0.93, =0.008; ΔLL, HR=0.79, 95% CI=0.67-0.95, =0.01).

Conclusion: After AIS surgery, patients who had fusion to the lower lumbar vertebrae (L3 or L4) experienced a higher incidence and faster progression of degenerative changes in the SI joint. Low preoperative LL and inadequate correction of LL during the operation were also risk factors for SI joint degeneration.

References
1.
Choi T, Chang M, Lee S, Park Y, Ha J, Park J . Differences in time-to-fusion based on "absence of peri-graft radiolucency" and "trabecular bone bridging" criteria after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with low and normal bone density. Skeletal Radiol. 2022; 52(4):733-742. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-022-04219-x. View

2.
Yoshihara H . Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar/lumbosacral fusion: current knowledge. Eur Spine J. 2012; 21(9):1788-96. PMC: 3459112. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2350-8. View

3.
Pagnini I, Savelli S, Matucci-Cerinic M, Fonda C, Cimaz R, Simonini G . Early predictors of juvenile sacroiliitis in enthesitis-related arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2010; 37(11):2395-401. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.100090. View

4.
van Tubergen A, Heuft-Dorenbosch L, Schulpen G, Landewe R, Wijers R, van der Heijde D . Radiographic assessment of sacroiliitis by radiologists and rheumatologists: does training improve quality?. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003; 62(6):519-25. PMC: 1754576. DOI: 10.1136/ard.62.6.519. View

5.
Sarkar M, Maalouly J, Ruparel S, Choi J . Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: Fusion Rates and Clinical Improvement Using Minimally Invasive Approach and Intraoperative Navigation and Robotic Guidance. Asian Spine J. 2022; 16(6):882-889. PMC: 9827198. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2021.0058. View