Young Adults Rehabilitation Experiences and Needs Following Stroke (YARNS): A Scoping Review of the Rehabilitation Care Experiences and Outcomes of Young Adults Post-stroke

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Date 2025 Jan 31

PMID 39888946

Authors

Colin Chandler

Catherine Clarissa

Arcellia Farosyah Putri

Lissette Aviles

HyeRi Choi

Jonathan Hewitt

Emily Hennessy

Helen Noble

Joanne Reid

Aisha Holloway

Daniel Kelly

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Stroke is one of the leading disabling conditions in the United Kingdom. While an increasing focus on the rehabilitation care for stroke survivors has been noted, practice guidelines, targets and services tend to be tailored for the elderly population rather than young adults.

Objectives: This scoping review aimed to map the existing literature on the rehabilitation care experiences and outcomes of young adults post-stroke aged between 18 and 45 years within acute and social care settings.

Methods And Analysis: A scoping review was conducted to identify existing practice and published academic and evidence-based literature related to the topic. Arksey and O'Malley's framework guided the review and reporting followed the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Electronic databases and grey literature were searched to capture the potentially recent and relevant literature available in English from year 2000-2022. The databases included CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, ASSIA, AMED, PEDro, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. Grey literature was searched from the following sources: Google Scholar, websites of networks, organisations and charities related to stroke. Hand searches were performed on the reference lists of the included articles and grey literature to find relevant references. Data were extracted on young adults' experiences of stroke and rehabilitation care and their outcomes and experiences of a particular stroke rehabilitation programme in acute and social care settings.

Results: Eighty-five articles were included in this review. In most instances, stroke was reported to negatively impact young adults, although positive consequences were also documented. The focus and the outcomes of stroke rehabilitation were predominantly physical especially in the areas of movement, communication and memory. Young adults experienced a lack of age-adapted stroke rehabilitation in acute and social care settings.

Conclusion: Our results highlight the unmet needs of young adults in their stroke recovery journey. Effective rehabilitation programmes and interventions should be developed to support young adults following stroke and meet their age-specific needs.

References

Theadom A, Rutherford S, Kent B, McPherson K . The process of adjustment over time following stroke: A longitudinal qualitative study. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2018; 29(9):1464-1474. DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2018.1440609. View

Lou S, Carstensen K, Moldrup M, Shahla S, Zakharia E, Nielsen C . Early supported discharge following mild stroke: a qualitative study of patients' and their partners' experiences of rehabilitation at home. Scand J Caring Sci. 2016; 31(2):302-311. DOI: 10.1111/scs.12347. View

Sadler E, Daniel K, Wolfe C, McKevitt C . Navigating stroke care: the experiences of younger stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil. 2014; 36(22):1911-7. DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2014.882416. View

Dalkin S, Greenhalgh J, Jones D, Cunningham B, Lhussier M . What's in a mechanism? Development of a key concept in realist evaluation. Implement Sci. 2015; 10:49. PMC: 4408605. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0237-x. View

Daniel K, Wolfe C, Busch M, McKevitt C . What are the social consequences of stroke for working-aged adults? A systematic review. Stroke. 2009; 40(6):e431-40. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.534487. View

Palstam A, Tornbom M, Sunnerhagen K . Experiences of returning to work and maintaining work 7 to 8 years after a stroke: a qualitative interview study in Sweden. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(7):e021182. PMC: 6082484. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021182. View

Low J, Kersten P, Ashburn A, George S, McLellan D, Kersen P . A study to evaluate the met and unmet needs of members belonging to Young Stroke groups affiliated with the Stroke Association. Disabil Rehabil. 2003; 25(18):1052-6. DOI: 10.1080/0963828031000069753. View

Masterson-Algar P, Williams S, Burton C, Arthur C, Hoare Z, Morrison V . Getting back to life after stroke: co-designing a peer-led coaching intervention to enable stroke survivors to rebuild a meaningful life after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2018; 42(10):1359-1372. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1524521. View

Townend E, Tinson D, Kwan J, Sharpe M . Fear of recurrence and beliefs about preventing recurrence in persons who have suffered a stroke. J Psychosom Res. 2006; 61(6):747-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.09.006. View

10.

Prajapati S, Gage W, Brooks D, Black S, McIlroy W . A novel approach to ambulatory monitoring: investigation into the quantity and control of everyday walking in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010; 25(1):6-14. DOI: 10.1177/1545968310374189. View

11.

Moorley C, Cahill S, Corcoran N . Life after Stroke: Coping mechanisms among African Caribbean Women. Health Soc Care Community. 2015; 24(6):769-778. DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12256. View

12.

Vaughan-Graham J, Brooks D, Rose L, Nejat G, Pons J, Patterson K . Exoskeleton use in post-stroke gait rehabilitation: a qualitative study of the perspectives of persons post-stroke and physiotherapists. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020; 17(1):123. PMC: 7488039. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-020-00750-x. View

13.

Dickson S, Barbour R, Brady M, Clark A, Paton G . Patients' experiences of disruptions associated with post-stroke dysarthria. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008; 43(2):135-53. DOI: 10.1080/13682820701862228. View

14.

Morris J, Oliver T, Kroll T, Joice S, Williams B . From physical and functional to continuity with pre-stroke self and participation in valued activities: a qualitative exploration of stroke survivors', carers' and physiotherapists' perceptions of physical activity after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2014; 37(1):64-77. DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2014.907828. View

15.

Feigin V, Krishnamurthi R, Parmar P, Norrving B, Mensah G, Bennett D . Update on the Global Burden of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke in 1990-2013: The GBD 2013 Study. Neuroepidemiology. 2015; 45(3):161-76. PMC: 4633282. DOI: 10.1159/000441085. View

16.

Thompson H, Ryan A . The impact of stroke consequences on spousal relationships from the perspective of the person with stroke. J Clin Nurs. 2009; 18(12):1803-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02694.x. View

17.

Holland A . Living successfully with aphasia: three variations on the theme. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2006; 13(1):44-51. DOI: 10.1310/13D7-R31R-8A0D-Y74G. View

18.

Tolat R, O Dell M, Avella H . Cocaine-associated stroke: three cases and rehabilitation considerations. Brain Inj. 2000; 14(4):383-91. DOI: 10.1080/026990500120673. View

19.

White C, Cantu A, Motz D, Patterson M, Caron J, Birnbaum L . Opportunities and challenges in secondary stroke prevention: a mixed methods study. Disabil Rehabil. 2018; 41(26):3192-3197. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1492029. View

20.

Salisbury L, Wilkie K, Bulley C, Shiels J . 'After the stroke': patients' and carers' experiences of healthcare after stroke in Scotland. Health Soc Care Community. 2010; 18(4):424-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00917.x. View