» Articles » PMID: 39885780

Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Stage III-IVA Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Real-world Study

Overview
Journal Sci Prog
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2025 Jan 31
PMID 39885780
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of combining induction chemotherapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage III-IVA nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), particularly focusing on cases associated with Epstein-Barr virus infection. The primary focus is on treatment response and disease control.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 81 patients with stage III-IVA NPC (excluding T3N0M0) treated with gemcitabine and cisplatin as induction chemotherapy, followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy at the Vietnam National Cancer Hospital. Patient data and follow-up information were collected between June 2021 and June 2024, focusing on disease-free survival (DFS) as the primary outcome and secondary outcomes including factors affecting DFS and treatment-related toxicity.

Results: In the initial 3-month period, 76 out of 81 patients achieved a complete response, and five patients achieved a partial response. The follow-up period averaged 18.7 ± 5.3 months, with a 2-year DFS rate of 77.6%. Key factors influencing DFS included patient age, N stage, disease stage, and treatment interruptions. Grade 3 toxicities observed included neutropenia (17.3%) and mucositis (32.1%), while grade 4 toxicity was limited to nausea (2.4%). Additionally, 2.6% of patients experienced delayed grade I-II toxicities, with some presenting grade III anorexia.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that gemcitabine and cisplatin induction chemotherapy, followed by chemoradiotherapy, may result in a high response rate and effective disease control with manageable toxicity. However, further research is needed to evaluate long-term outcomes and potential delayed adverse effects to confirm these initial observations.

References
1.
Mao Y, Tang L, Chen L, Sun Y, Qi Z, Zhou G . Prognostic factors and failure patterns in non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Chin J Cancer. 2016; 35(1):103. PMC: 5192583. DOI: 10.1186/s40880-016-0167-2. View

2.
Kuderer N, Choueiri T, Shah D, Shyr Y, Rubinstein S, Rivera D . Clinical impact of COVID-19 on patients with cancer (CCC19): a cohort study. Lancet. 2020; 395(10241):1907-1918. PMC: 7255743. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31187-9. View

3.
Li W, Wu H, Lv S, Hu X, Liang H, Liu G . Assessment of Survival Model Performance Following Inclusion of Epstein-Barr Virus DNA Status in Conventional TNM Staging Groups in Epstein-Barr Virus-Related Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4(9):e2124721. PMC: 8461502. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.24721. View

4.
von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M, Pocock S, Gotzsche P, Vandenbroucke J . The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007; 147(8):573-7. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010. View

5.
Kristensen C, Kjaer-Kristoffersen F, Sapru W, Berthelsen A, Loft A, Specht L . Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Treatment planning with IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy. Acta Oncol. 2007; 46(2):214-20. DOI: 10.1080/02841860600635862. View